this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
353 points (97.1% liked)

Curated Tumblr

4118 readers
3 users here now

For preserving the least toxic and most culturally relevant Tumblr heritage posts.

The best transcribed post each week will be pinned and receive a random bitmap of a trophy superimposed with the author's username and a personalized message. Here are some OCR tools to assist you in your endeavors.

-web

-iOS

-android

Don't be mean. I promise to do my best to judge that fairly.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] irmoz 79 points 3 months ago (1 children)

7th implied fact: the baby's religion somehow plays a role in your deciding whether or not to hit it with a bat.

[–] T156 46 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Eigth implied fact: The baby is durable enough to be hit by a baseball bat hard enough to fling it out of the stadium, and remain in one piece.

[–] FooBarrington 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] T156 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The baby is hardly going to make it out of the stadium if it splashes on impact.

[–] FooBarrington 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Maybe not all, but individual parts should be far more aerodynamic!

[–] Bertuccio 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Are there rules for that in baseball? If the ball breaks up I assume there's no play and they do over.

[–] T156 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Got bored and looked it up, and there aren't, surprisingly. At least not in the 2019 revision of the Major League Baseball rules. But they do define what a ball is, and isn't, and a baby is not considered a valid ball (3.01).

But at least according to Rule 5.01(c)(1), if part of the baby gets on the batter, they might be considered "hit by pitch", and therefore eligible to advance to first base. (It would be considered a 'dead' ball, which is funny, given the context.)

The rules aren't written expecting the ball to break into bits upon impact, so it'd depend on it actually happening to get precedent.

But at least going by 4.01(a,e), it's the umpire's fault for providing an invalid "ball", and they might have to clean up, since they're tasked with replacing the "ball" if damaged.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I would assume the baby's head is what counts as the ball, here. If it detaches in a large piece and leaves the stadium, it should likely count.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

Do they have spare Christian babies on hand though?

[–] GraniteM 1 points 2 months ago

"So you're playing baseball, and Martha Kent is the pitcher..."