this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
108 points (98.2% liked)

Historic(al) Map Porn

815 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to c/old_maps @ Mander.xyz!

A community about captivating historic and historical maps from around the world, from the oldest examples known to those created around 1950.



Notice Board

This is a work in progress, please don't mind the mess.



About

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Be kind and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.


Links



Similar Communities


Sister Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Plants & Gardening

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Memes

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tylerdurdon 12 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I don't know about your guys, but I recognize one name only. Tells you how thorough the genocide was, eh?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago

Many of our cities states and regions in America are named for these tribes, so you probably know more than you think.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've only been to North America twice, and I recognize several dozen.

[–] Tylerdurdon 5 points 1 month ago

I hadn't zoomed in enough to see the smaller names below.

[–] evasive_chimpanzee 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The 16th century is old enough that some people groups went through name changes, and many of the names you are familiar with are not on here. This map also prioritizes the endonym (what they call themselves) name over any exonyms (what other people call them). Some exonyms are just anglicisations of the endonym (or another European language), or sometimes they are direct translations or the native name, or names from another tribe.

Apsáalooke means "crow" in the Apsáalooke language, so most people call them Crow.

Additionally, writing these names in the Latin alphabet is not always done the same.

I do find it hard that you wouldn't recognize more than one name, though. I'm no scholar, but I counted at least 140 that I recognized, and I'm sure I would recognize more of them under other names.

If there's a tribe who's name you know that isn't on here, it's probably because it was a less popular exonym (like souix, for lakota), or they didn't exist yet (like the Seminoles), or it refers to more than one tribe (like iroquois).

[–] Tylerdurdon 2 points 1 month ago

Thank you for the info! I hadn't zoomed in enough to see the smaller names which I do recognize.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Really, not even the exonyms in smaller printing below the endonyms?

[–] Tylerdurdon 2 points 1 month ago

Oh! I hadn't zoomed in enough!