this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
61 points (95.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35882 readers
3676 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Buddahriffic 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also, what's to stop you from generating new hash information that is consistent with the new media if you do modify an existing one?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You'd need secure chips that can't reveal the key, and those would be signed by a trusted authority.

Then there'd be a black market for valid chips, or maybe some tomfoolery to make a camera think it's seeing something that's being fed into it via a different input.

[–] Buddahriffic 4 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah, forgot about cryptographic hashing for a moment there. Though that "trusted authority" is the weak point, probably only a matter of time before it is corrupted and gives keys out to powerful others.

Or same thing for any workers with access to either the central key or one of the others. And if a specific company's key gets leaked, does that mean anything produced by their devices can no longer be trusted? If there's an inconvenient video in existence, will the way of defeating it just be to leak the private key protecting its hashes and just say that the hackers must have gotten ahold of the key earlier than everyone else to explain how that video existed before the key was leaked publically?

Or even just have someone break in to each of their systems and steal the keys but leave evidence of it happening and use that to create reasonable doubt about whatever videos they want to call fake news.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Like maybe taking a video of a screen playing a video/a video projected on a surface?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The timestamp of the original hash being sent to a central server.

That's the whole point of sending that hash close to when it happens.