this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
839 points (98.8% liked)

Steam Deck

14892 readers
80 users here now

A place to discuss and support all things Steam Deck.

Replacement for r/steamdeck_linux.

As Lemmy doesn't have flairs yet, you can use these prefixes to indicate what type of post you have made, eg:
[Flair] My post title

The following is a list of suggested flairs:
[Discussion] - General discussion.
[Help] - A request for help or support.
[News] - News about the deck.
[PSA] - Sharing important information.
[Game] - News / info about a game on the deck.
[Update] - An update to a previous post.
[Meta] - Discussion about this community.

Some more Steam Deck specific flairs:
[Boot Screen] - Custom boot screens/videos.
[Selling] - If you are selling your deck.

These are not enforced, but they are encouraged.

Rules:

Link to our Matrix Space

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Why is Nintendo in particular this aggressive against emulators? Why haven't we heard of Sony going after PCSX2 and RPCS3, or Microsoft going after Xenia and Xemu?

[–] vinnymac 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It is likely due to age and popularity. At this point PCSX2 is the only widely popular emulator you've listed, but is older, in the same way Dolphin is old and less of a concern of harming their limelight. That isn't to say those other emulators aren't making waves lately, but there is a window between age and popularity that makes this software a prime target. Especially emulators for current gen, which has been historically very rare, and when it did exist were no where near as good as CEMU, Yuzu, and Ryujinx were.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think this also shows how underpowered Nintendo consoles are; the Switch is essentially a slightly upgraded Wii U, which itself was only marginally better than the PS3 and Xbox 360! If Nintendo really wanted to combat piracy, all they had to do was beef up their flagship console to the point where it's hard to emulate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

And triple their price? I guess the Switch is priced the way it’s priced so people can actually afford buying one.

[–] nek0d3r 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In general I'd agree, although Citra feels like an exception. I'm not quite sure why they targeted that one so hard.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I'd guess it is because the most popular way to acquire games for Citra was Nintendo's own servers

[–] vinnymac 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Probably for the same reason Nintendo shuttered the stores for 3DS and Wii U over the last year. They are attempting to consolidate infrastructure, support, user base, and sales.

[–] nek0d3r 2 points 1 month ago

Now that Citra isn't available, Nintendo knows I have no choice but to buy Samus Returns on my Switch!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Nintendo sucks that's why

[–] ekZepp 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

According to what i've read around, the Switch 2 will be retro-compatible with the Switch and a big sellout will be possibility run all the old games in full hd with higher frames (something emulators already do better). Also this may have been used to adapt current emulators to the new console games.

[–] ysjet 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Because none of those emulate current generation systems.

People act weirdly entitled about Nintendo product, throw shitfits when Nintendo reacts exactly like Sony or Microsoft would to them doing the same thing, then act extra hurt that Nintendo did it.