this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
74 points (98.7% liked)

News

23423 readers
4820 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. Supreme Court launches its new nine-month term on Monday with several major cases already on its schedule - involving guns, transgender rights, online pornography and more - and with the possibility of confronting legal disputes that may arise from the Nov. 5 presidential election.

The court, whose 6-3 conservative majority continues to move U.S. law rightward on a range of topics, is coming off another blockbuster term capped by its contentious July 1 ruling granting Donald Trump broad immunity from criminal prosecution for many actions taken while president.

The justices return from their summer recess under intense scrutiny by many politicians and the public not only for their legal rulings but for simmering ethics scandals, unsolved leaks of confidential information, and some public airing of differences among themselves.

"Something does feel broken," Lisa Blatt, a lawyer who frequently argues before the court, said during an event in Washington on Tuesday. "Some of them up there - at oral arguments when I see them - they just seem visibly frustrated."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dual_sport_dork 34 points 1 month ago (4 children)

This is simple: Keep your hands off my guns, quit picking on transgender people, and leave my porn alone.

Easy. I ought to be on the supreme court. Think of the payroll savings if you just fired all nine of those motherfuckers.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The ghost gun thing is particularly ridiculous. You've always had the right to make your own firearm, and for decades the BATF has said that if a receiver (or frame, or whatever) is only 80% complete, that it's legally not a firearm (yet). The reason it's an issue now is that it's finally easy enough for a regular person to make their own. Once you start regulating a block of metal--or in the case of New York, a 3D printer--as though it was a firearm, where does it realistically end? If I can pay $20,000 for a Haas 5 axis benchtop CNC mill, then a plan block of aluminum is not a 'gun' since I can easily mill it to be such.

[–] billiam0202 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

where does it realistically end

Somewhere at the bottom of that slippery slope, I imagine.

There's always going to be a threshold where things that previously weren't problems, become problems. Imagine trying to argue that DUI laws shouldn't exist because when you have had one beer you're fine, but once you've had 20 beers now the police have a problem with it. How many beers is too many? We don't know since that's different for everyone- but we all agree at some point, it's too many.

You yourself pointed this out: when such weapons weren't easily available, they weren't really a problem. Now that they are easily available, they're a problem.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Imagine trying to argue that DUI laws shouldn’t exist because when you have had one beer you’re fine

Eh, except you probably aren't. Depending on the state, your size, the beer, etc., one may be enough to put you over the legal limit.

The big issue is that there's no difference at all between a 3D printer that's used to print cute little toys and useful household gadgets, and one that's used to print a Glock-style frame. It's the same printer. So it's absolutely unreasonable to regulate all 3D printers as though they were firearms, but that's what some states are pushing to do. The second big issue is that the BATF has had regulations for years about what part constitutes a gun, and what parts are unregulated. Now the ATF is changing the rules, and prosecuting people that relied on prior rulings before doing anything.

[–] dual_sport_dork 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How many beers is too many? We don’t know since that’s different for everyone- but we all agree at some point, it’s too many.

This is literally exactly how it works, though. There is a legal percentage threshold of blood alcohol content wherein it becomes illegal. The line there is drawn. And although where it is drawn is specific, it's not in the same place, on a state-by-state basis.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

What they said is still valid, and the point they were making aligns with yours.

We don't know since that's different for everyone - but we all agree at some point.

That point is, in our societies, the legally mandated limit of blood alcohol content. How many beers does it take to hit that limit? Without some specific knowledge of an individual, literally no one could say with any certainty. We could make generalities:
One beer over an hour, when drank with a moderately heavy meal.

But there's no way to say "This is too many beers!" Because it is entirely a per person situation. Hell, some people wouldn't blow over the limit and be so drunk they can't stand up.

[–] ValorieAF 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And don't you DARE touch my transgender gun porn!!!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

But that's my fetish 😔

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Tbf there's 6 that should definitely go. The other 3 are good.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

I bet those 3 would be willing to go if it meant the other 6 were also gone.

[–] Late2TheParty 4 points 1 month ago

I'll vote for you in the next election. :-D