this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
203 points (99.0% liked)

Political Memes

5269 readers
1944 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

This is a job for Kristi Noem.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Soup 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It still sounds weird. Like how is it that in a country like the U.S. these parties can wait to choose who will be the leader of the fucking United States as far as only two months before an election? Like, should they not have planned that shit ahead of time? I know the U.S. is a shithole but it’s a shithole with a tonne of power and influence and that feels…wrong. A bit “fast and loose” with democracy, ya know?

I’m glad it meant the Dems could swap out Biden for someone with a pulse but fuck that’s weak.

[–] mycodesucks 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I mean, the amount of time the US takes is an outlier. Most countries announce and have elections in a shorter time span than 2 months, and if it's a proportional government, sometimes you don't find out the leader until AFTER the election.

[–] Soup -4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Things being worse don’t make that good, though. Whatever, I’m not going to change world politics over here but I still think it’s all kinda fucked.

[–] BottleOfAlkahest 8 points 4 days ago

A lot of people would consider that good...not worse. Like the UK has a cap on the amount of money and time that some campaigns can be. That allows candidates who aren't flooded with money to have more of a chance at actually being elected. It helps make the formation of a two party system run by the Koch brothers less likely...

[–] AngryCommieKender 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

As an American, that doesn't sound worse. It sounds wonderful. A two month campaign means that we could focus on something else for the rest of many, if not most, years.

Also would make it just a tiny bit more difficult for big money to be able to influence the election as easily.

Hell, gimme a 1 month campaign season with two weeks of preview, for the candidates to declare their candidacy before the month of campaigns. I have enough time in 1 month to research the available candidates, make my decision, and mail my ballot back to Sacramento.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

You understand that legally speaking in most countries the leader is chosen after the election? People dont vote for their favourite TV personality, they vote (in order of preference) for their local representative from a party they like.

Yes most of them will have a party leader but this not always the resulting national leader, eg prime minister, particularly if the parties choosing to form a government have some compromises to make.

If anything the US election campaign is ridiculously long and early.