this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
1075 points (98.1% liked)

Microblog Memes

6027 readers
2726 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Not really a meme, I know, but I thought this was amazing and worth sharing and I didn't know where else to share it on Lemmy.

Ursula LeGuin was an incredible person and, although she did live a long life, her death was still a huge loss.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid 112 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

She really was. She has an amazing essay that starts "I am a man." It is not about her gender identity, it's just a terrific feminist essay which is also about what society thinks of the elderly (especially women).

You see, when I was growing up at the time of the Wars of the Medes and Persians and when I went to college just after the Hundred Years War and when I was bringing up my children during the Korean, Cold, and Vietnam Wars, there were no women. Women are a very recent invention. I predate the invention of women by decades. Well, if you insist on pedantic accuracy, women have been invented several times in widely varying localities, but the inventors just didn’t know how to sell the product. Their distribution techniques were rudimentary and their market research was nil, and so of course the concept just didn’t get off the ground. Even with a genius behind it an invention has to find its market, and it seemed like for a long time the idea of women just didn’t make it to the bottom line. Models like the Austen and the Brontë were too complicated, and people just laughed at the Suffragette, and the Woolf was way too far ahead of its time.

So when I was born, there actually were only men. People were men. They all had one pronoun, his pronoun; so that’s who I am. I am the generic he, as in, “If anybody needs an abortion he will have to go to another state,” or “A writer knows which side his bread is buttered on.” That’s me, the writer, him. I am a man.

https://languagelog.ldc.upenn.edu/myl/IntroducingMyself.html

I also cannot recommend enough (thanks for the correction!) her novels The Left Hand of Darkness and The Dispossessed.

The former is about a visitor from Earth to a planet colonized by humans thousands of years before and those humans were genetically engineered to be hermaphrodites. It's an amazing view of a society that has no concept of either sex or gender.

The latter is about two societies- an ultra-capitalist society on a planet and an anarcho-syndicalist (anarchist/communist) society on an orbiting moon. She illustrates the positive and negative aspects of both societies, although the capitalist one definitely has more negatives.

Incidentally, she also has a series of fantasy novels about a world of islands called Earthsea. The first novel is about a seemingly normal boy who turns out to have magical powers, is sent to a school where you learn to be a wizard and ends up fighting the biggest threat to magic after becoming the most powerful wizard on Earthsea. Sounds familiar, doesn't it? Funny that it was written back in 1968. A certain well-known TERF was born in 1965...

[–] [email protected] 23 points 3 months ago (1 children)

As someone who grew up at the height of the potter craze, and was well and truly entrenched in it (stood in line for the books, read them through without sleeping, went to events, et cetera) I can honestly say that the first earthsea book is legitimately better than the potter books. I'll never be able to hate the HP books, despite despising JKR, but a wizard of earthsea is just much better written. It's so freaking good, and tells it's story in such a charming and completely unique way.

[–] FlyingSquid 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I have re-read all of the books and short stories a couple of times. They're really good. The BBC did a radio dramatization of the books a few years ago. It was pretty abridged, but still worth hearing.

Mainly though, I just wanted to point out how Rowling very clearly used LeGuin as a source for her books (along with the Worst Witch books, the first of which came out when she was exactly the right age to have read them).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Haven't heard of the worst witch, I don't think, unless that's the one that also uses a magical platform at kings cross

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If you're British, I can't explain that. If you aren't, it's big in the UK (or at least used to be?) not only a whole book series, but a movie and a TV series.

The movie stars a very young Fairuza Balk and was big enough to get Diana Rigg and Tim Curry in it.

So not exactly Harry Potter, but still well-known. And certainly known well enough for Rowling to not have only heard of them, but very likely at least read the first one because she was 9 years old when it came out, which is pretty much the perfect age for that book.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

No, sadly I live in the US :(

[–] AFKBRBChocolate 21 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I just reread The Left Hand Of Darkness last month, and it's such a great book. Nothing in it is dated. It was written in 1969, and it's not just about hermaphrodites; the people of that planet are essentially genderless except once a month when, if they get together with someone else also going through it, one becomes female and the other male essentially randomly - it could switch next time. She takes that situation and explores what a society like that would be like. Further, it's told through the eyes of a more traditional male who seems somewhat misogynistic. It's an amazing piece of work, and it's amazing it was published when it was.

[–] TSG_Asmodeus 8 points 3 months ago

"I just reread The Left Hand Of Darkness last month, and it’s such a great book."

It was my introduction to her writing, and wow what a fucking book. I read it in two days, I couldn't put it down.

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 3 months ago

I admit I haven't read it in many years, so thanks for correcting me on the details. The way she goes in depth exploring the societies and beings she imagines while still maintaining a plausible plot and believable characters you can empathize with is really incredible. It's something other writers rarely achieve. Iain M. Banks had similar literary skills.

[–] captainlezbian 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Well that description got me to place a hold on it at my library. I have a hard time getting into new authors and have wanted to try her work for some time

[–] AFKBRBChocolate 3 points 3 months ago

I'm confident you won't regret it. I read quite a lot of SF, both older and newer. There's a lot of classic SF that's really good, but you have to constantly keep in mind the time it was written in because the story or the characters or the dialog is dated. There was zero of that with that book, it could have been written yesterday (the setting kind of insulates it culturally and technologically). And the sensibilities are so, so far ahead of its time.

[–] Thwompthwomp 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I read left hand of darkness and loved it. It was my first Le Guin. I had heard a lot about the gender themes, and was surprised to find how it does not it you over the head at all. It was a great adventure and just really stuck on your head thinking. The dispossessed was another one like that. Its message is a little bit more obvious, but is an incredibly well built world that really is anarchist. All of her works I’ve read so far are great to read. There are extremely strong themes, but she seems to present it a bit more as a take it or leave it approach than a lot of the other (cough, Heinlein) I grew up reading.

[–] captainlezbian 1 points 3 months ago

So it sounds like the Mormonism in the stormlight archive. Where it’s ever present but requires literary analysis to see

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

The latter is about two societies- an ultra-capitalist society on a planet and an anarcho-syndicalist (anarchist/communist) society on an orbiting moon.

Sounds very similar to The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress, one of my favorite books.

Instead, Earth had colonized the moon, and is doing the normal routine of extracting all possible value at all costs. They are shipping ungodly amounts or ice water from the moon's ice caps down to earth, which has left the lunar denizens with little water, and few crops. So they stage a revolution to avoid the impending collapse of their society.

They go into the actual war strategies a moon might take upon a parent planet, and it is fascinating, I highly recommend it.

[–] FlyingSquid 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

A bit, but I felt like Heinlein's book was much more 'hit you over the head with the message' than her books ever are. I still really like it, don't get me wrong, but it's much more heavy-handed in terms of messaging. LeGuin lets you mostly figure it out for yourself. You can certainly read her books and not learn a thing if you don't want to (many people, especially her male critics over the years, do so), but if you open your mind to what she's saying...

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'll have to take your word for it on the strength of messaging, as I haven't read LeGuin yet. But it's definitely been added to my reading list.

I like politics/religion/etc as topics well enough, but usually never enough to read about on their own as a book. It just doesn't sit well with me.

But add a bit of science fiction to it? That god damn I'm on board. It's like taking meds with a bit of honey for me. So when I find authors that explore things and have some fun with it, I jump at the chance.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I also cannot recommend her novels The Left Hand of Darkness and The Dispossessed.

I hope you meant you can recommend them. They're both very good.

I liked the dispossessed a lot

[–] FlyingSquid 3 points 3 months ago

Yes, sorry, fixed.

[–] Carrolade 8 points 3 months ago

Her older stuff is good, but I've always been of the opinion she got progressively better and better as she got older. Birthday of the World, a short story compilation, is a masterpiece.

Her overall style is particularly well-suited to the short story format, as it allows her to hyper-focus on just a few themes, letting her stay almost uncomfortably tight. She's already the kind of author that can leave you thinking for an hour with a single paragraph, and short stories almost let her condense a work into a higher percentage of just those paragraphs.

[–] ClanOfTheOcho 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Cannot recommend? Or cannot recommend enough? I don't want to put words in your mouth, but that's exactly the sort of brain typo that I would make, giving my audience exactly the opposite claim to what I'd intended, and based on context, I think the latter is what you were going for?

I've heard of Earthsea, but had no idea what it was about. Now I may need to pick it up. I rather enjoyed a more recent story with a similar plot, written by an author with, shall we say, less progressive opinions.

[–] FlyingSquid 5 points 3 months ago

Whoops. The latter.