this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2024
491 points (99.6% liked)

World News

39279 readers
2764 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In short:

Facebook is scraping the public data of all Australian adults on the platform, it has acknowledged in an inquiry.

The company does not offer Australians an opt out option like it does in the EU, because it has not been required to do so under privacy law.

What's next?

Facebook representatives could not say whether an opt-out option would be offered to Australians in the future.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So stuff people post publicly should be private?

[–] BassTurd 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

If I post a picture on my private profile that only my friends can see, yes, that should be private.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but what if you post public stuff for the public to see? That’s what’s in question here I believe

[–] BassTurd 0 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The post says everything, which would include the private.

[–] Womble 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Facebook admits to scraping every Australian adult user's public photos and posts

[–] BassTurd 1 points 3 months ago

You're right. I misremembered.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It does say public, but I guess it's a confusing article. In any case, I'm all for privacy and not defending social media at all, just that if someone else chooses to not be private then they shouldn't be unhappy if it's actually not private is what I meant.

[–] BassTurd 1 points 3 months ago

You're right, I had misremembered the phrasing. I just hate that the current state of affairs is everything you put online is going into model training. I feel everything should be opt in. If a company wants to profit off of my stuff, they should have to ask, even if it's hosted there, especially since when these social media sites first came about, the idea of training data models with user information wasn't a thing.

I'd begrudgingly accept a cutoff where anything prior to a date where terms were explicitly set to include language for data modeling was excluded. It's really dumb that the advent of new technologies just allows companies to profit of anyone's creations with permission.