232
Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs loses $100m default judgment over sexual assault allegations
(www.theguardian.com)
this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2024
232 points (98.7% liked)
News
23623 readers
4771 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"Court records show that Cardello-Smith is incarcerated at the Earnest C Brooks correctional facility after multiple previous convictions of criminal sexual misconduct. The Metro Times reported that he taught himself criminal and civil law during his incarceration while also developing “a long history of challenging the judicial system” with lawsuits.
Combs is not the only prominent defendant named in one of those lawsuits. Another is the Roman Catholic archdiocese of Detroit, in a lawsuit alleging that two of the organization’s priests as well as one of its lay employees sexually abused Cardello-Smith between 1979 – when he was about seven years old – and 1993."
I don't see how Combs doesn't appeal this, and get this stayed, now that there's a judgement. Dudes not going to start simply paying this may $10 million a month.
Nice victim shaming attempt, when his own record since his alleged Combs assault plays no part in this (his first offense was 1998 - which is a year after the alleged assault). An assault like this can mess people up, although that doesn't excuse his wrongs, but they may help explain his mindset.
You also left out 2 of the more key parts of your cherry picking -
A judges don't usually hand out restraining orders like candy on Halloween, and I assume when the person asking is currently incarcerated even less so?
So Combs went to the jail himself to talk with this guy instead of sending a lawyer on his behalf, interesting that.
He didn't even contest it in court though - wouldn't that make an appeal difficult?
I mean it's the law so lawyers can try whatever appeals they like but from my incredibly limited understanding, default judgements aren't usually appealable unless there was a structural/procedural mess up.
So if combs wasn't notified (we all know that's not true), or if there was a reasonable reason he didn't respond (got into a car accident on the way to the courthouse/deployed to Iraq), or some local procedural misstep by the plaintiff.
But failing that courts are pretty strict about enforcing default judgements as final. God knows they don't want people just not showing up as a tactic.
On the surface, the order seems like it couldn't be appealed for most of the usual reasons. I wonder if they could play the "my client couldn't respond because it may violate his 5th amendment rights in a related criminal case" or something like that. That seems like the type of thing a lawyer might try.
It's a civil trial - IIRC you can't plead the 5th in civil trial in the same way you can a criminal trial. The only thing I think they have a chance with is the amount.