this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
912 points (99.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

19623 readers
69 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NocturnalMorning 46 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't say stuff like that. You're gonna give me a heart attack.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

The more disk you had, the longer it took. It walked the scsi bus which took forever. So if you had more disk. It took even longer.

Since everything was remote, you’d have to call hands and they weren’t technical. Also no cameras since it was the 90’s.

Now when I restart a vm or container. I panic if it’s not back up in 10 minutes.

[–] NocturnalMorning 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I get annoyed if my pc isn't restarted in 30 seconds now.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think mine takes like 2 minutes. It’s ten years old. I’ve putting off upgrading to the cost of videos cards

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I got an M.2 drive last year after having a motherboard capable of it for 3-4 years, and naturally named it "Plash Speed".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I will never not laugh at this video.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why would you design a disk driver that way?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It isn't a disk driver since the OS is not loaded yet. It is the hardware identifying each disk in the SCSI chain. Not sure what else it was doing walking the bus much I know finding all the disk was the longest part.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Shoot, it did occur to me that might not technically be the right word.

Still, even if you're an engineer in the late 80's, it seems like it would be obvious you need a way for disks to announce themselves in O(1) time. Was it just a limitation of interoperability between vendors or something?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

I think it was just a limit of how quick everything ran back then. Also, this was an IBM system that was checked, double-checked, and triple-checked because it was a mission-critical system. IBM used to be known for quality hardware. Hard to imagine because they are such a crap company now but that was the equivalent of a google back then.