this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
490 points (85.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

26239 readers
3325 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Costs nothing to harvest a plant, too.

foraging for plants is a lot less calorie efficient than hunting or fishing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Lmao not if you're hunting with spears!

Or are we allowed to use tools in this hypothetical digression?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

you're the one obsessed with defending a paper whose scope was too limited to cover any of these scenarios so do what you want i guess

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You're the one obsessed with dismissing the paper based on qualifiers beyond the scope of the research, so you do you I guess.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i'm not dismissing the paper. i'm explaining how it's being deceptively framed.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't think there was anything deceptive about its framing, it was addressing the claim that 'vegan diets are a luxury'

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

but it doesn't actually show whether poor people can afford a vegan diet. it's misleading.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not trying to prove that people on food stamps can afford a diet the government hasn't designed their food program for them to afford lmao

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s not trying to prove that people on food stamps can afford a diet the government hasn’t designed their food program for them to afford lmao

no, but beaver's claim that it's 30% cheaper may not be true for those people. i mean it could be. it could possibly be EVEN CHEAPER. i don't really know. and the linked oxford study doesn't tell us.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago

i don’t really know

YES, now you're getting it