this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
254 points (92.9% liked)

Fuck Cars

9603 readers
870 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

"Giving people more viable alternatives to driving means more people will choose not to drive, so there will be fewer cars on the road, reducing traffic for drivers."

Concise, easy to understand, and accurate. I have used it at least a dozen times and it is remarkable how well it works.

Also—

"A bus is about twice as long as a car so it only needs to have four to six passengers on board to be more efficient than two cars."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mayo 19 points 2 months ago (2 children)

A lot of people choose not to live in the city with good transit because housing is too expensive, so they live in the 'burbs. All that extra money means they can get a fancy new car lease. They drive into the city and because cars are allowed everywhere 24/7 there is no reason for them to look for alternatives in high traffic zones.

[–] Treczoks 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Have you ever considered that for many people not living in the city this "extra money" simply does not exist?

[–] Telodzrum -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm convinced that everyone else on Lemmy is so poor that purchasing the device they use to access this site was one of the worst financial decisions available to them.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

The median house price in the US is >$400,000. Rent around here for a 2bd is 2500, and I don't even live in a place with mass transit.

Unless you're buying a new phone every month, it's not affecting your ability to buy a house or rent an apartment in a city.

[–] stoly 7 points 2 months ago (2 children)

That’s the old way. There’s no real difference in pricing now until you move into the exurbs. For more and more people it’s better to pay a bit more and not have to commute while having easy access to the city’s amenities.

[–] Treczoks 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

A "bit" more? Have you seen rent levels in the last few decades?

[–] pathief 3 points 2 months ago

Rent must be incredibly affordable in the US from what I'm reading here.

[–] AceSLive 2 points 2 months ago

I live in Melbourne, Australia - and I couldn't afford anything within an hours drive of the city.