this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2024
729 points (96.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

5397 readers
3962 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

“WHO IS IN HERE??”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Counterpoint, if you leave the lid open, you're flinging shit particles all over the bathroom, potentially onto toothbrushes.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Realistically they are going to get everywhere anyway, but I still close it in a harm reduction effort.

[–] CallMeButtLove 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm going to continue to pretend it works lol.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

So answer the question above, do you then lift the lid to check if it worked? Or do you believe your shit is magic, and makes all toilets work perfectly?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago

My friend, you either take some massive shits worthy of awe, or you’ve got a bad toilet if this is a regular issue for you.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I shit in the same toilets with enough consistency to know they do the trick without further investigation.

[–] blanketswithsmallpox -2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Sounds like that horror story about the wife seeing the dude wipe once and be done with it saying that he's never had to wipe more. She requested he do it again and he came back with another huge ass streak.

Homie, we all leave some gross shit now and then but dude above preaches when you have people in your house who dump floaters and streakers constantly. Nothing worse than opening the bathroom door to know you'll be greeted with a gross ass half dissolved usually green tinted floater with half the bowl streaked and everyone acting like it wasn't them. Meanwhile you end up having to try to piss blast it for a week but it's so caked on by that point you actually have to take the extra 30 seconds to use the toilet brush...

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Lolol I also own a bidet, regularly clean, and apparently eat more fiber than some of y'all. 😂

No doubt I'll have some worse than others, but I assure you I'm not coming back to no bio hazards after one flush.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Often the problem isn't really the fault of the last person who shat. It can be the kid who used way too much TP the night before and clogged the pipes. Or in our case it can even be one of the upstairs apartments, but that's a real disaster.

[–] hydrospanner 2 points 3 weeks ago

Right.

One of the things I won't miss about my last apartment (which was overall pretty fantastic) was how the plumbing was under-built when they constructed the otherwise overbuilt building back in the 60s or 70s.

This meant that on my end of the building, all 4 apartments (mine, the other one on my level at the end of the hall, and the two above us) all shared the same undersized drainage piping.

I was there 6 years, and averaged about 1.5 horrific backups per year that required a call to management, who had to come out, try to fix, then give up and call professionals (and twice in that 6 year span, the professionals even gave up and had to call in even more capable professionals).

In every case, I always asked them if there was anything I could be personally doing...or not doing...that might help.

In each case, the plumbers always said I was doing everything I could, even above and beyond considering the more capable drain filters I used on both sink and tub, and that the real issues were the long hair from the ladies in all 3 other apartments (not a criticism on them, just an observation that many of the clogs were long hair, vs my buzz cut), and in a few of the worst cases, flushed hygiene products (which prompted a mass email from the landlord that these things were not to be flushed, both feminine hygiene stuff and "flushable wipes")...and in the worst backup, the two young girls in the family above me had flushed a wash cloth.

That last one was the worst by far. Had disgusting, chunky shit water/gray water cocktail backing up into toilet AND shower.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

That was tested with Mythbusters. When your toothbrush is nearby there was hardly a difference if you flush open or closed, sorry :)

[–] eltrain123 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

‘Hardly a difference’ and ‘no difference at all’ matters when it comes to ingesting doo doo particles. I opt for the absolute least amount possible… preferably none.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah, it had no lid, and unfortunately that part of the end-scene is cut off on YouTube. It was this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nb-_KRh8asM

The control toothbrushes outside the bathroom had the same amount of fecal coliformes on them. That stuff is everywhere, it doesn't matter if you flush lid open or closed.

[–] eltrain123 -2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Run this quick experiment for me.

Hold your toothbrush/phone/anything on your bathroom counter above the toilet, with the lid open, then drop it. Repeat the experiment with the lid closed.

Which one offered a more preferential result?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

I've never in my 33 years in life dropped something in an open toilet bowl. My toothbrush is above the sink, not the toilet. The only thing I store above the toilet is a spare roll of toilet paper.

[–] hydrospanner 6 points 3 weeks ago

I avoid the non-preferential result by...well...not dropping things in the toilet.

I'm in my late 30s and have literally never dropped anything in the toilet that I wasn't intending to.

Sounds like a personal issue; maybe try not to be so clumsy?

[–] Linnce 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I had to present this paper for a fluid mechanics class during COVID and yes, the particles do spread. The radius of contamination was almost 1,5m.

Shared bathrooms in hospitals, rehabilitation centers, or assisted living facilities are used by patients who might be infected, thus making them a likely source of indoor cross-contamination. The pathogen-spreading potential of toilet flushes was investigated in toilets seeded with microorganisms that were later recovered from surfaces and in the air after flushing. The organisms in the bowl could not be fully cleared even after repeated flushing, and the droplets produced by flushing harbored the organisms that were used for seeding, which remained airborne and viable.

Recently, Johnson et al. (2013a) investigated different toilet designs and found that up to 145,000 sampled particles can be produced per flush.

Analysis of more recent data revealed that a large number of droplet emissions are not visible to the naked eye (d < 100 µm) (Figure 6b). These emissions account for more than 6 mL and can remain suspended in the air for a long time compared to the larger visible drops (with diameters up to 6 mm) that end up on surfaces.

The larger visible drops settle on surfaces within milliseconds, whereas the smaller, invisible drops are advected by local airflow (on the order of a few centimeters per second). Droplets settling on surfaces can be tackled in accordance with surface decontamination procedures of local infection control protocols. However, no system or protocol currently addresses air contamination. Furthermore, usual cleaning solutions not effective in neutralizing the most resistant pathogens, such as the spores of C. difficile, may even contribute to their dissemination by effectively lowering the surface tension, for example, down to 30 mN/m, compared to water at 72 mN/m, increasing the local Weber number and thus promoting fragmentation into either more or smaller droplets, depending on the fragmentation mechanism.

https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-fluid-060220-113712

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Source?

I'm pretty sure you're misremembering that episode. It didn't involve lid closed vs open.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Ah, it had no lid, and unfortunately that part of the end-scene is cut off on YouTube. It was this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nb-_KRh8asM

The control toothbrushes outside the bathroom had the same amount of fecal coliformes on them. That stuff is everywhere, it doesn't matter if you flush lid open or closed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Again, source?

We've established that you misremembered the lid test already, so I don't see why we should trust your memory on this.

I'm particularly skeptical of this assertion:

the same amount

I'm well aware there are some fecal particles all over the place. But common sense says that aersolaized, shit-filled toilet water (which the video confirms it does spray out droplets into the immediate area) would accumulate more on toothbrushes sitting closer to the toilet than in another room.

Edit: also, were they testing by flushing just normal toilet water? Or flushing after a shit?

Because if it was just toilet water, then the test isn't even relevant to the discussion.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

https://mythresults.com/hidden-nasties

Many objects that people touch every day are dirtier than a toilet seat.

I'd surely hope those tests were done with actually in-use toilets, lol. The toilet seat would be sprayed with the lid down, so it's a good indicator?

And here is the toothbrush one https://mythresults.com/episode12 (on the bottom). Maybe you can find the full TV episode, right now I can't.

Either way, as long as you don't have a vacuum toilet that sucks everything down you won't escape. I just rinse my toothbrush with water every time before I use it, which seems to be good enough so far.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

Again, they weren't flushing fresh bowls of shit, just standard toilet water.

You're absolutely spraying shit all over your toothbrush for no good reason, and that's disgusting. Sorry :)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I could have sworn they tested both. I remember them concluding that lid position didn’t matter.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

The human memory is such a fickle thing.

[–] SkunkWorkz 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

If you smell a fart you are breathing in shit particles. It doesn’t matter unless someone in your household is severely ill.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

If you smell a fart you are breathing in shit particles.

This is incorrect. A fart smells bad because of gasses like methane, not poop particles.

(Also, relevant username.)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Neat, thanks for sharing that you don't care how much shit you ingest. I'll reduce my intake where I can, thanks.

[–] dufkm 2 points 3 weeks ago

A little bit of shit is good for your immune system. I'm microdosing on feces to stay strong and healthy.

[–] SkunkWorkz 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

They said, with a literal shit-eating grin.