this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
221 points (99.1% liked)

Space

8857 readers
351 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula

Related Communities

๐Ÿ”ญ Science

๐Ÿš€ Engineering

๐ŸŒŒ Art and Photography

Other Cool Links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L7ePvmEn
Bitswap
[email protected]
Agamemnon
otter
221
NASA decides to keep 2 astronauts in space until February, nixes return on troubled Boeing capsule (apnews.com)
submitted 3 months ago by teft to c/space
36 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

This is not what I've read.

Boeing engineers tested the thrusters and managed to replicate the issue. They found that there issue was caused by a bulging of a Teflon valve.

However they don't understand the root cause of why the Teflon is bulging.

So Boeing said it's safe for the astronauts to return on Starliner but they also said that they fixed the thruster issues they had on the previous flight.

Not all NASA is confident that the Starliner is safe enough.

[โ€“] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

IIRC, the whole thing is a bit of misconception in the popular imagination. It'll reenter just fine if it manages the right maneuvers. The risk is hitting the ISS on the way out.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And actually making those maneuvers. If the seals bulge again and disable a thruster, they might be unable to control their flight.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

The 1 thruster experiencing that worst case isn't needed. The 27 others all tested high 90% range through multiple hot fires a couple weeks back.

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Was this update. About five minutes of update starting at this timestamp.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wLNeIx7AwVE&t=2m12s