There are a lot of reasons, but all of the NATO countries that were supplying Ukraine put very tight restrictions on how that equipment could be used. For example, none of the aircraft or artillery were allowed to be fired into Russia for fear of a nuclear escalation.

They've been slowly relaxing that restriction and it gave Ukraine more freedom to run the campaign as they see fit

[–] Don_Dickle 34 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I am rooting for them. I hope they do like the Wagner Group and make it all the way to Moscow.

[–] foggy 46 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I hope Ukraine fills in the gap to Kazakhstan and takes everything south until Georgia.

Maybe Georgians would actually finally have a decent situation.

Maybe. 😕

I'd love to visit St Petersburg, Finland, someday.

[–] ivanafterall 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

F-16s buzzing the Kremlin when?

[–] tetrachromacy 32 points 3 months ago

I believe also that the predominating thought in this war among the generals that plan it is that a shake up to the current status quo was needed. Invading Russia gives Ukraine a bit of leverage, plus it draws away RU troops from the front line so that Ukraine may be able to retake a bit of ground.

Grand Poobah Pooty Putin can only say so many times that he's moving nukes to ready status or whatever until it becomes clear he's not going to use them. Nuking anybody, especially Ukraine, would be a tacit admission to the world that he's losing this war. If he did, NATO would likely get involved presumably because they would consider the fallout drifting over Europe to be an act of war, but a casus belli is a casus belli.

So yeah, I can see NATO countries being ok with a strike inside of Russia now. Makes total sense to me. I'm just surprised it took this long to get there.