this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
1401 points (98.8% liked)

Political Memes

5425 readers
2040 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Hopefully not our current supreme court, because that's where any rehashed version of the fairness doctrine would undoubtably end up. And from the purely originalist stance that this court would obviously take, it is a pretty cut-and-dry first amendment issue.

There's also the point that truths and facts are two totally different yet related things. Truths are the subjective interpretations of objective facts.

Two people can experience the exact same thing and have a wildly different telling of the exact same events. Neither are necessarily untruthful, but through the omission or inclusion of various facts and context, hell even tone, the truth can be told wildly different ways.

This is quite obvious when watching different news networks cover the exact same event.

[–] Serinus 4 points 3 months ago

the purely originalist stance that this court

I'm not disagreeing, but I don't want them getting credit they don't deserve.

They sure weren't very originalist when they made the president a king