this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2024
340 points (92.3% liked)

Technology

59391 readers
3961 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s
[email protected]
[email protected]
L4s
enu
340
JPEG is Dying - And that's a bad thing | 2kliksphilip (www.youtube.com)
submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/technology
156 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] AnUnusualRelic 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You're thinking in terms of the individual user with a handful of files.

When you look at it from a server point of view with tens of terabytes of images, or as a data center, the picture is very different.

Shaving 5 or 10% off of files is a huge deal. And that's not even taking into account the huge leap in quality.

[โ€“] AdrianTheFrog 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

jpeg xl lossless is around 50% smaller than pngs on average, which is a huge difference

https://siipo.la/blog/whats-the-best-lossless-image-format-comparing-png-webp-avif-and-jpeg-xl