this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
337 points (94.7% liked)

News

23437 readers
3914 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Soon, Old Glory will have to be born in the land of the free and not merely flying over it.

Congress has passed a proposal to require the federal government to purchase only American flags that have been completely manufactured in the U.S. The U.S. imports millions of American flags from overseas, mostly from China, and the sponsors of the proposal said it’s time for American flags to originate in the country they represent.

Supporters of the proposal, led by Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine and Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio, said the change is more than just symbolic — they believe it will support American jobs and manufacturers while preserving the nation’s most recognized banner.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Actually logistical costs and transportation is one of the highest expenses and some groups have already found that buying from local suppliers who get local raw materials (such as Climate Town's merch Tees) can have competitive costs even when adjusting for higher labor costs just from the manufacturer being located near the farms that grow the cotton and shipping locally within the nation.

Granted the government purchased flags will likely be expensive but that's mostly because of a quality requirement from the fact they need to be flown outdoors for some time without fading or damaging in any way. And that's probably true currently since the flag needs to be made 50% in the country already.

Seriously look at the brownie recipe of the US military for how strict government funds are spent for specific quality requirements and you get why it's slightly more costly than the imported flour with lead or insects in it.

It's not about cost/quality being the best match but a good use of the funds and locally supporting business in an age when that matters is more important. Globalization and long distance transportation can not always be the answer.

[–] MirthfulAlembic 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Great, and where local is the best choice they should do that. But nobody can seriously argue that reducing the ability of government to shop around for the best cost/quality balance is a good thing. It's not like the only options are buy everything American or everything from China. I'd like qualified experts making that decision, not legislators.

You create bad incentives if you artificially reduce competition like this. Not every good or service will have tons of American choices, so you end up with a handful of companies who know the government has no other choice.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We absolutely do not need foreign countries to produce all the materials for a flag at the cheapest cost. The price difference is likely negligible and shopping around can still be done.

Why is everyone so scared of taking back some production from China?

You guys are allamong weird assumptions that this is some million dollar lynching instead of just saying buy the materials you use to make from a local supplier. This counter argument is insane and literally doesn't matter cause it passed.

[–] MirthfulAlembic 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I'm not quite sure how you've turned "we should have the option" into "we should buy everything foreign." I think you're having an argument you want to have rather than addressing the point I was making.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Because not everything should be bought foreign. There is no need or good reason to take something that can be easily and cheaply produced locally that is sold directly to the government and try to get the cheapest one abroad.

It's asinine and completely against all the shouting that these communities literally do every week about local manufacturing being needed to combat outsourcing.

Your reasoning is flawed cause there is no reason to support foreign import either. Especially when the other option is to support the country they govern even if it's just a little bit.

I truly don't understand this hand wringing of this simple change unless you are paid for by Chinese interests. It's not always about being cheap.

[–] MirthfulAlembic 1 points 4 months ago

I'm genuinely not certain if you are meaning to reply to my comments because your replies don't actually reflect what I've said. It is possible to have a larger discussion about a topic from a smaller example, and it's also possible for things to not be all or nothing. I hope you can sort whatever bee is in your bonnet.