this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
710 points (97.5% liked)

Science Memes

11399 readers
1091 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
710
Dragonflies (mander.xyz)
submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
78 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 62 points 4 months ago (6 children)

This implies that there's some sort of evolutionary advantage to getting sloppy seconds. I don't know how I feel about that.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Everyone loves a good underdog story.

[–] danc4498 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Everyone loves a good raw dog story.

ftfy

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Well, do you think women consent was at thing back in the early days of homo sapiens?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 months ago

Yes I do. Do I think every sex was consensual? No. Do I think at least 1% of women had at one point consented to sex? Yes.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

nah poligamy were just the norm

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Polyamory is the word you're looking for polygamy assumes marriage

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

oh, i didn't knew that thanks

[–] Dasus 1 points 4 months ago

However "-amory" implies romantic relationships. We're talking sexual interactions, not love.

When discussing animal social behaviours, "polygamy" is used.

https://www.britannica.com/science/polygamy-animal-behavior

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh, so that's why it's such a turn on, it's evolutionary advantage!

[–] Mango -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

No that's the gay.

[–] davidagain 4 points 4 months ago (2 children)

If being gay (not bi) is so obviously an evolutionary disadvantage, how does it exist in humans and animals in statistically significant numbers?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Turns out there may be more to this evolution thing than 'first past the post'. Non-reproductive members of a species can help other members of the species to survive.
Essentially it's not about getting "my genes" into the next generation, it's really about getting the genes of "my species" into the next generation, and beyond.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780124201903000302

https://theconversation.com/homosexuality-may-have-evolved-for-social-not-sexual-reasons-128123

[–] davidagain 2 points 4 months ago

That makes a lot of sense.

[–] Mango 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Because we like it and liking things is reason to live.

[–] NikkiDimes 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It doesn't matter how long you live if you have no offspring. It feels like, statistically, gay people really shouldn't exist. Yet here we are.

Hi, it's me, the strangely existing gay person!

[–] davidagain 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And long, long, long may you exist and be happy, NikkiDimes.

[–] NikkiDimes 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Live long, prosper, and be gay (and do crime)! 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈

[–] davidagain 1 points 4 months ago

You do that. Well perhaps not the crime!

[–] Asidonhopo 2 points 4 months ago

Species survive not just as individuals, but as groups.

[–] davidagain 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

OK. May your life be full of love and... er, ... satisfaction.

[–] Mango 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Benny Benassi kind?

[–] davidagain 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well, yeah, whatever floats your boat, gets you going, rings your bell, dings your dong, pops your champagne cork, whatever bangs your drum, tinkles your tonkles, whatever gets into your groove and whatever, quite frankly, bedazzles your vajazzle or spurts your spunk. That kind of satisfaction. Just so we're clear. Hope that answers your question.

[–] Mango 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

[–] davidagain 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

All of the yes.

[–] Mango 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Okay. I floated my boat.

[–] davidagain 2 points 4 months ago

Nice.

[–] 4lan 5 points 4 months ago

We are animals, monogamy is not a part of humanity like it is in penguins.
Our penises reshaped over millenia of orgies just to get all the other guys cum out. We are sluts of the animal world, like rabbits

[–] Buddahriffic 2 points 4 months ago

It implies that there were enough guys getting sloppy seconds for dick shape to give a reproductive advantage.

While it could have been from a lot of free love in the ancient past, I suspect it's more likely much darker than that and the evolution of cuckolds is intertwined.