this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
152 points (95.8% liked)
A Boring Dystopia
9751 readers
300 users here now
Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.
Rules (Subject to Change)
--Be a Decent Human Being
--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title
--Posts must have something to do with the topic
--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.
--No NSFW content
--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Here's the thing. This isn't a generational thing. People of all ages, at all points in time were unhappy. The difference is, I'm in my 40s, and I don't sit there and tell everyone who asks if I'm unhappy.
"Hey, how are you?"
"Good."
And then everyone moves on with their life. Doesn't mean I'm doing good. I just know that nobody gives a shit that I'm not doing ok, and never have been doing good mentally.
Whereas younger people haven't figured out yet that all their friends will eventually betray them, all their love interests will eventually leave them, happyness is a myth, and that we all die depressed and alone. So younger people are more vocal, thinking it's going to change something.
Holy shit that's even doomy-er than me, and I very much doubt that I will ever be able to afford to retire and am skeptical that society is going to last long enough for that to be a meaningful concern.
We live in a world where you're designed to fail, and yet suicide is thought of as selfish, and wrong, and you're an asshole if you're comfortable with the idea of people doing it.
All so a very select few, who have in no way earned it, get to hoard all the worlds wealth. While modern day slavery not only exists, but is promoted within these circles. Just yesterday there was a post on Lemmy about how some CEO thinks that Gen Z should work long hours, doing anything their asked, all for free. So people on Lemmy make their jokes, and nothing is solved. That woman still fully believes she's entitled to slave labor. Other CEOs will use slave labor in other countries, because those countries don't have any kinds of protections in place to protect humans from that type of behavior. These people will fully use and abuse those under them, for FUN. They don't even need to get a financial benefit for it. Just the fact that they can treat people like dirt, and face no reprocussions, is enough to get their jollies off.
And it's not new. This has been happening for centures. It will keep happening for MORE centuries. And all this talk about "Vote for this guy, vote for that guy" ultimately doesn't do much since the politicians don't have any real power anyways. Good or bad, all these "plans" politicians talk about are just that....plans. Plans that never come to pass. I can remember Bill Clinton saying in 1991 that he would be open to reevaluating how marijuanna in this country is handled from a legal perspective. If he had made it legal, MILLIONS of citizens (and no, I'm not exaggerating) wouldn't have criminal records. Police in this country are trained to look for people who can't legally defend themselves, and create a problem that puts them in jail. Where you're legally a slave. Again, not exaggerating. It's literally how the 13th amendment is worded. Slavery is legal if you become a prisoner to the state.
And so with all of this happening in the world, your first thought is "Ok, so how do we change it?" and that's the part that no one is willing to admit. You DON'T change it. You have no power. You never did. You're voting on an election for a person who either way doesn't have power. It's the way this country, and every other country has been set up for longer than any of us have been alive. The world is, and always has been, designed around the profit of others suffering. So it will continue until long past your dying breath. This is the system working as intended. Nothing is wrong in the eyes of those who run things....other than they want more of what little you do have.
There have been many periods in history often referred to as a "Golden Era" which is location based, but generally only came to pass when people started doing something about their poor place in life.
I've never quite understood the prisoners dilemma. Millions vs a few, id definitely bet on the millions. It just sucks that we are all much to comfy to do anything about it (and half of that million would now happily fight for the few)
Its not comfort keeping us from doing anything, its that we're collectively too tired and stressed and wondering how we're going to keep making ends meet to organize and revolt. To perfectly illustrate the prisoner's dilemma: if the working class of the US banded together and did a general strike, we'd have what we want/need within a week due to what that would do to the economy and rich people's lines not going up. But too many of us would readily step into the spot that was just vacated by a striker because they're hungry and care more about survival than actions that would do more for them long term.
The way the Prisoner's Dilemma works is the idea that multiple players in a game choosing what is individually rational for them does not actually result in the best outcome for them as a group.
The whole point is that from the perspective of a single prisoner, ratting out the other guy is the best option, independent of what that other guy does.
So, with two prisoners unable to coordinate their strategies (isolated), they go with what is individually the most rational strategy, even though the is suboptimal, whereas if they were not isolated and could coordinate their moves, they would choose an absolutely optimal outcome for themselves as a group.
If one prisoner rats the other out, and the other does not, the rat gets a superficially better outcome, whereas the trusting one that was betrayed gets absolutely screwed.
...
If you did a game theory version of a Revolution, this problem is worse by orders of magnitude.
Sure, yes, if millions of people actually overthrow a broken system and establish a more equitable one, almost every one (non billionaires) are better off.
But if only one person revolts, they are jailed or die.
Add to that that the planning and coordination of trying to organize a million 'prisoners' to all revolt is itself a crime, and it is no wonder that such things rarely happen.
The idea is basically that for an individual, expecting, assuming, hoping for cooperation from the other players is individually risky, likely to be costly, thus, it is less likely to occur.
If your plan only works if millions go along with you, and if millions don't, you end up dead or in jail, and you have no real way of knowing that millions will go along with you... then for most people the shitty status quo is preferable to death or jail.
...
There are situations in real life and in game theory where styles of cooperation, or of testing loyalty in a repeated series of games that can lead to cooperation, do exist, but the studies on this are basically fancy math showing how difficult trust and cooperation are to achieve, and how easily trust is lost and never regained once betrayed.
Burdens shared are often easier to bear than burdens borne alone.
And you are afraid they might actually change something, because that'd mean you'd have suffered for nothing.
No, I'm just certain they won't. Change takes a big revolution. A united revolution. And half our country is gagging on the elites ballsacks.
Which is exactly what they want. They have a legalized method of population control in the police. They use hallow points of division to spread hate, like racism, politics, and religion.
The end result is everybody is fighting each other, rather than forming a french style revolution.
And even the french revolution failed in the long term, because they had no long term game plan to fight corruption. So over the years things just went back to how they were.
And now with global communication comes global influences from the outside. Now the people controling you don't have to even be on the same continent as you.
That the "newer" generations insist on dealing with the things fucking them over and making them unhappy is completely destructive to your "point".
You do nothing so you get no benefit. Quelle surprise, you still have no point. So you lie and avoid the question/subject or you suffer in silence like a regular person/drunk in Russia?
Sage advice, so glad for this contribution. You're officially part of the problem the moment you start implying others should lower their standards cuz you win the olympics of suffering.
You seem to be missing the point of what I'm saying. I'm saying that younger people are recorded as suffering. Whereas older people aren't recorded as suffering. So the numbers show younger people are suffering in greater numbers than older people....when that's not the case at all. The older people just don't say anything, and therefore there's no record of it.
It doesn't matter what anybodys standards are. Higher, lower, doesn't matter. We all end up in the ground.
Being depressed and plowing through isn't a testament of your honorable resilience. It means you should seek out help. Life isn't like this for most people.
I totally get why this comment is downvoted
Because people don't want to admit that we live in a world, and always have, and always will, where human suffering is profitable to those in control.
Unfortunately this analysis is a year over year comparison over the same age groups, not an age over age comparison in the same year. So your claim would not apply in this case.
Doesn't matter. I'm talking about an age group. Just like 7 year old boys will always love trains. Doesn't matter if that boy is 7 in 1921, 1945, 2002, 2024, 7 year olds will always love trains.
And everybody, regardless of age, will be miserable. It's just that when your younger, you're more vocal. When you're older you realize you're not changing shit. So just do what you can instead.
What do you mean brother? The whole point of this paper is that the youth of age 18-24 in 2024 are not behaving like the youth of age 18-24 in 2009 up to 2018.
Oh, they absolutely did. The same problems that exist today, have existed for hundreds of years. The only thing thats new is covid.
Damn, homeboy, get your depressed ass on some Lexapro or some shit.
The difference is, older generations were more willing to believe the lies of society, young people less so
I wouldn't be so sure that generational sentiments never will change, it's possible that this time it's different, and young people who are in shitty conditions would be much more willing to make change and outright speak against capitalism and current systems.
Why would it be different this time? Because of the internet, and greater acknowledgment, awareness, and lessened stigma of mental health issues and general life struggles.