this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
1501 points (98.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

6456 readers
1729 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheDemonBuer 319 points 7 months ago (15 children)

If you live in Nevada, Arizona, Texas, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia, or Florida (really any of the fifty states, but these are the most critical), AND you don't want to see Donald Trump elected for a second term, you must vote for Joe Biden in November. Yes Biden is a doddering old man who is experiencing rapid cognitive decline, and yes it is totally unacceptable that these are our choices, but disengaging does not solve the problem, it only makes it worse.

Believe me, I completely understand the inclination to just say to hell with it and check out, but we can't do that. I have been as guilty of it as anyone but I now fully recognize it was a mistake. But it's not too late to make it right. Voting is not only a right, it is a responsibility. If we, the people, want to rule, we must be vigilant and responsible.

Right now, our priority is damage control and harm reduction. I know, it has been that way for far too long, and that is extremely frustrating, but it is nonetheless the reality of the situation. We must vote for Biden this year, and then we MUST stay engaged so that we can work toward nominating the best possible candidate in 2028. We must stay informed and vote, diligently, in every state, local, and primary election.

[–] rayyy 47 points 7 months ago (10 children)

doddering old man who is experiencing rapid cognitive decline

Only in the media. Also, according to the media, the orange 34 count felon is completely fine, A-okay, in fact.
Get a grip America. Biden's policies are popular with Democrats AND Republicans

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If you want to be more strategic, if you can convince right wingers to not vote that also can make a difference. Feed your red-hat uncle's ideas about how voting is rigged so he shouldn't bother. Tell your maga neighbor you'll drive him to the polls and then don't.

This is an existential crisis. Don't think the right wing won't do anything they can to win.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim 17 points 7 months ago

Or convince them to vote RFK. My dad would normally vote Trump, but he's an anti-vaccine nutter, so I'm trying to convince him to vote RFK instead.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is such a great strategy, also mention how tRump passed the Unconstitutional bump stock ban and doesnt give a damn about the 2nd amendment.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The problem is, the people who are swayed by this argument were already going to vote Blue no matter who.

To win the election, you need to convince voters who are still doubting between Trump and Biden. And they have definitely heard this argument before, so a different argument is needed.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 7 months ago (2 children)

No, the point of the argument is to convince the people who are not planning to vote at all to show up.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The last presidential election had ~60% turnout. That's one of the highest turnouts EVER. People sitting at home are indeed the problem.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

While voter apathy is a big problem, it is likely that voter suppression targeted at the tie breaking areas has more of an effect on the overall outcomes. Suppression includes duscouraging engagement, leading to apathy.

Like I have voted in every election that I could, but my electoral college votes always went to the person I voted against. Even locally the vast, vast majority of my votes were for the losing party. It is really hard to not be apathetic, and for me voting is a breeze.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Agreed. And to your point, competitive states without voter suppression like Wisconsin and Michigan had turnout of around 75%, while Texas (which is most known for suppressing voters) only achieved 60% turnout.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim 4 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Texas is mostly a cultural issue. The left in this state are a bunch of defeatist do-nothings who think Texas will always be red. I cannot tell you the number of times I've talked to a like minded person, asked them about voting, only for them to give some half-hearted excuse why they didn't/won't.

With the way early voting works here, suppression is hard to pull off. For 2 weeks you can show up at any polling place to vote, even the ones in the rich white neighborhoods. The last time I voted, it took all of 10 minutes. There's no doubt some fuckery with voter registration, but you have plenty of opportunity to check your status online ahead of the election.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I have read a lot of reports on how Texas doesn't provide polling places in poorer, minority neighbourhoods, forcing them to travel far to vote.

And I have also heard reports of people who had to stand in line for hours to vote in Texas. Again, in poorer, minority neighbourhoods.

Are you saying those reports are not true?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

they're true and you'll only see them the most in houston and san antonio and a little bit in a dallas and austin.

source: me, a poor brown man who used to live in texas and tried to vote there for 5 years.

the excuses they come up to de-register you are with are laughable to hear; but texan officials will say it with a straight face and texan "liberals" will justify it by saying "it's the law".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

moving from san francisco to austin has taught me that texan "left" is further right than in most places; but yes, they're defeatists to the extreme and it makes sense given the state's political recent history.

[–] Ensign_Crab 0 points 7 months ago

The left in this state are a bunch of defeatist do-nothings who think Texas will always be red.

Couple that with a state party that cuts funding to progressives because they're not republican-adjacent enough.

[–] Ensign_Crab 1 points 7 months ago

While voter apathy is a big problem, it is likely that voter suppression targeted at the tie breaking areas has more of an effect on the overall outcomes. Suppression includes duscouraging engagement, leading to apathy.

And Congress could have done something about it when Democrats had the majority in both houses. In one hand, they had the John Lewis Voting Rights Act, and in the other, they had the continued preservation of the Jim Crow Filibuster.

Democrats chose to keep the filibuster.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dogsnest 2 points 7 months ago

The debate fallout has made the fence-sitters' decision for them.

Dems need a parachute candidate pronto. Kamala would win, too.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ohio used to be a swing state, too, right? Not sure of it still is or if it isn't, how that turned around. But maybe they should be in the list?

[–] captainlezbian 20 points 7 months ago (1 children)

We went for Obama twice and trump twice. It’s complicated. We’re mostly just extremely gerrymandered and divided. Columbus is extremely liberal, rural Ohio is frequently terrifyingly conservative

[–] stoned_ape 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

We did do the right thing in most of the special elections these last twelve months, though

[–] captainlezbian 6 points 7 months ago

Hell yeah we did. We often do the right thing when faced with a direct democratic clear choice.

[–] Rolando 7 points 7 months ago

Important to talk to people we know, and make sure they actually vote.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago

If you want to be more strategic, if you can convince right wingers to not vote that also can make a difference. Feed your red-hat uncle's ideas about how voting is rigged so he shouldn't bother. Tell your maga neighbor you'll drive him to the polls and then don't.

This is an existential crisis. Don't think the right wing won't do anything they can to win.

[–] edgemaster72 5 points 7 months ago

But ~~the economy~~ rich people's yacht money though!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It would be nice if Biden or the Dems or really anyone had a plan to protect us or to somehow stop what we're seeing happen before our eyes, but it just seems that there's no end and the second a republican gets in power it's all over for us

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 4 points 7 months ago

I can't count the number of times I've heard people insist that Biden's DOJ is doing a great job, but also that all these Republican leaders are committing crimes with impunity.

[–] MudSkipperKisser 4 points 7 months ago

I so want nothing to do with this election, I feel so defeated and disgusted by all of it BUT I keep reminding myself that if I don’t vote then I essentially voted for whoever ends up winning. And that could easily be Trump. And in my view he’s not just an awful candidate, he’s an existential threat eat to democracy. So I will vote. But damn, literally almost anyone else could beat Trump, why this is our choice is so insane.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

If it's that dire, why is it not more important than Biden's massive ego and power hunger that he doesn't care to step down even if it pretty much means Trump's gonna win?

load more comments (3 replies)