this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
246 points (95.2% liked)

politics

18069 readers
4994 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] cabron_offsets 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Half of that table has no fucking data, and you’re saying that Biden is better than the competition?!?

[–] FlowVoid 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Brand new data shows that no Democrat outperforms Biden against Trump.

Also, when asked who should replace Biden the clear favorite was Kamala Harris. So be careful what you wish for.

[–] cabron_offsets 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Harris performs the same as Biden in a head-to-head matchup against Trump.

So we get the same performance without concern for age, etc. what’s to lose?

Also, I didn’t see a MoE reported.

I’m not a fan of Harris, but we need to keep trump out of the WH.

[–] FlowVoid 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We'd be trading concerns over Biden for concerns over Harris. If there is no improvement in performance, why bother?

[–] cabron_offsets 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Risk management. I’d rather someone unconnected to the administration, though.

[–] FlowVoid 1 points 14 hours ago

There are significant risks to nominating Harris.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would have loved to see the results if they had included any progressive possibilities in there... especially Bernie.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You've got to stop kidding yourself, most of america does not.share your/our political opinions, it feels like it when inside a bubble like on here but the wider reality of people who actually vote they're not going to win.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Still would be nice to see the results if they had been included.

Gen z and millennials are far more progressive than Gen x or boomers. The "swing vote" this election is going to be young people... And they want a progressive candidate to get excited about or they are unlikely to show up enough to defeat Trump.

It doesn't necessarily have to be Bernie, any true progressive will do... Bernie just has the most name recognition.

https://www.dataforprogress.org/insights/2024/5/30/measuring-the-swing-evaluating-the-key-voters-of-2024

[–] Dkarma 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Do you not understand the power of incumbency???? Lol get a clue.

[–] cabron_offsets 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The incumbent just shit the bed on live tv and fell into the trap set by the degenerates. You can huff as much copium as you want, we’re fucked without a shakeup of some kind. Brandon has a chance, sure, especially if Trump chokes on a fucking hamberder, but that’s not a risk worth taking. Swapping him out for a charismatic leader is a risk worth taking. Now kindly fuck off.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

They kinda set the trap themselves on that one. They took the risk of putting him on TV and he lost.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 2 days ago

The previous incumbent lost during a major crisis, which is supposed to be like the most sure-fire way for a president to get re-elected.

I think the rulebook is taking a break at the moment.