this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2024
698 points (96.3% liked)

pissposting

1022 readers
3 users here now

Piss tier memes, lower than shitposts. Brain damaging stuff.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] voltaric 143 points 1 week ago (38 children)

For those who don't know, the US systematically mutilates the genitals of baby boys and young boys.Sciences points to the foreskin being a protective and erogenous dual layered membrane.

It is not 'one side' pushing this. This is how the American people take their aggression out on males.

[–] aidan 10 points 6 days ago

Just to add: its not unique to the US, its even more common in many African, Middle Eastern, and majority Muslim countries

[–] [email protected] 169 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

You had me until the last sentence. There are a lot of deeply misguided—and plain fucking stupid—reasons that circumcision has become seen as the 'norm' in the US, but I don't think it's how the American people takes its aggression out on men?? That's a pretty unhinged thing to think. I understand the anger and frustration at genital mutilation of babies (bc that's what it is, in my opinion), but let's come back to earth a bit.

EDIT: since this comment is getting attention, I just wanted to add that it really does seem like people are waking up to how fucked circumcision is. We just had a baby, and as part of our stack of information brochures given to us by the hospital (in Oklahoma, a deeply red state), there was a whole page dedicated to circumcision pros and cons. You could tell it heavily favored not circumcising, and preserving bodily autonomy was it's own full bullet point on the cons side, as well as busting myths that people perpetuate trying to justify it still.

Also, in our infant care courses, they showed some really awful pictures of freshly-circumcised baby penises. We had already decided not to circumcise for obvious moral reasons, but that made us feel even more secure in our decision. I feel like more parents need to see that stuff to make them realize what's actually going to be done to their baby with the procedure.

All that to say, I think there's hope for decreasing the occurrences of this deeply awful cultural practice!

[–] brlemworld 36 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Insurance companies should do what they do and make it be a cosmetic surgery and not cover it. It should cost thousands in cash.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

At a minimum. Also, the law should make it illegal.

[–] Emerald 2 points 6 days ago

Unless it's out of medical necessity

[–] rollerbang 12 points 1 week ago

Even better would be to simply banun, unless there are proven medical reasons.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Leveraging the broken health care system to attack the revanchist cultural system?

I mean, maybe. But when child birth already runs into the $20k-$50k range, I doubt anyone is going to notice the $150 they charge for foreskin removal until the bill arrives.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's what they're saying. The typical cost is $20k-$50k, with all but ~$3k covered by insurance.

If insurance doesn't cover it it's now $1200 out of pocket.

Making it illegal would be better, but that requires convincing people. Even if you approve of circumcision, you're still not going to be surprised when your insurance company drops what you consider to be something important.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If insurance doesn’t cover it it’s now $1200 out of pocket.

Where does a routine circumcision cost $1200? That's the same as Lasik.

Making it illegal would be better

Maybe you could try this by leveraging all the anti-Trans legislation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I can honestly tell you I did not search very hard. First results for how much it cost said $500 cash price, and up to $4000 as billed to insurance. I picked a number in the middle.

Honestly it didn't seem that weird to me that removing skin from the genitals of a newborn would be along the same price as non-invasive outpatient surgery.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I did not search very hard.

:-/

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 days ago

It's an online discussion. I'm not going to go price shopping for average circumcision costs by state broken down by insurance coverage.
Random urologist lists cash and insurance prices for infant circumcision? Done, that's the range I'm using.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Meh, it'd be a $200 add-on charge.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] voltaric 39 points 1 week ago (10 children)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 week ago

None of that has anything to do with the US "taking aggression out on males". Circumcision should be stopped but you're grasping for reasons here--there's no countrywide conspiracy to continue pushing it. The reasons are from historical pseudoscience and it's been in decline for 30 years.

[–] uranibaba 7 points 1 week ago

That was a rabbit hole of reading.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)