Games

30470 readers

525 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

Submissions have to be related to games
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
No excessive self-promotion
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

548

Bethesda Is Charging $7 For A New Starfield Mission, And Players Are Upset (www.gamespot.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by Potatos_are_not_friends to c/games

169 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] BombOmOm 69 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

That is my current solution. Currently enjoying Factorio, which had the perfect monetization scheme: you buy the game and enjoy it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

Not to mention, it is entirely possible to get home from work, play, and then realize you are now late for work.

Its just engaging on a level that most modern game's can't hope to achieve.

Hell, I've installed a game (old), then installed mods, then resolved all the mod issues, then launch it to realize I don't actually want to play it.

Factorio? Mods are easy, and vanilla is enough to keep someone occupied and happy if they lack internet or something.

Its light weight too, it costs me virtually nothing to install it on anything that can run it.

[–] Takumidesh 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Factorio also interestingly, never goes on sale, Wube said that the value of the game is what it is and that's that.

[–] Marcumas 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

This only works because it's like $30. If this was a $60-70 game, I don't think it goes over well with the public. Nintendo is the only one that seems to get away with that

[–] batmaniam 2 points 1 week ago

I think that's exactly the point though. "We didn't mark it up to mark it down, the price is just the price". As a chronic patient gamer part of me hates that (I love finding older classics for like $10) but I don't mind shelling out for a good game. The biggest expense is my time, and if a bunch of years later the price hasn't moved it's probably worth my time.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

$35, actually.