this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
2184 points (97.4% liked)

Fediverse

17788 readers
13 users here now

A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.

Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".

Getting started on Fediverse;

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
2184
PSA: Lemmy votes can be manipulated (feddit.nl)
submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
327 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The best part of the fediverse is that anyone can run their own server. The downside of this is that anyone can easily create hordes of fake accounts, as I will now demonstrate.

Fighting fake accounts is hard and most implementations do not currently have an effective way of filtering out fake accounts. I'm sure that the developers will step in if this becomes a bigger problem. Until then, remember that votes are just a number.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That sounds a bit hyperbolic.

You can externalize the web of trust with a decentralized system, and then just link it to accounts at whatever service you're using. You could use a browser extension, for example, that shows you whether you trust a commenter or poster.

That list wouldn't get federated out, it could live in its own ecosystem, and update your local instance so it provides a separate list of votes for people in your web of trust. So only your admin (which could be you!) would know who you trust, and it would send two sets of vote totals to your client (or maybe three if you wanted to know how many votes it got from your instance alone).

So no, I don't think it needs to be invasive at all.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What if the web of trust is calculated with upvotes and downvotes? We already trust server admins to store those.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I think that could work well. At the very least, I want the feature where I can see how many times I've upvoted/down voted a given individual when they post.

That wouldn't/shouldn't give you transitive data imo, because voting for something doesn't mean you trust them, just that the content is valuable (e.g. it could be a useful bot).