this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2024
161 points (98.8% liked)

Android

27951 readers
202 users here now

DROID DOES

Welcome to the droidymcdroidface-iest, Lemmyest (Lemmiest), test, bestest, phoniest, pluckiest, snarkiest, and spiciest Android community on Lemmy (Do not respond)! Here you can participate in amazing discussions and events relating to all things Android.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules


1. All posts must be relevant to Android devices/operating system.


2. Posts cannot be illegal or NSFW material.


3. No spam, self promotion, or upvote farming. Sources engaging in these behavior will be added to the Blacklist.


4. Non-whitelisted bots will be banned.


5. Engage respectfully: Harassment, flamebaiting, bad faith engagement, or agenda posting will result in your posts being removed. Excessive violations will result in temporary or permanent ban, depending on severity.


6. Memes are not allowed to be posts, but are allowed in the comments.


7. Posts from clickbait sources are heavily discouraged. Please de-clickbait titles if it needs to be submitted.


8. Submission statements of any length composed of your own thoughts inside the post text field are mandatory for any microblog posts, and are optional but recommended for article/image/video posts.


Community Resources:


We are Android girls*,

In our Lemmy.world.

The back is plastic,

It's fantastic.

*Well, not just girls: people of all gender identities are welcomed here.


Our Partner Communities:

[email protected]


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In its services and repair terms and conditions, Google says it will keep devices sent in for repair if they have a non-OEM part.

Update:

Google changes repair policy after criticism of third-party parts ban Google previously said it would not return mailed-in devices using "unauthorized" parts.

Source: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/06/google-changes-repair-policy-after-criticism-of-third-party-parts-ban/

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] obinice 68 points 5 months ago (2 children)

This must be nonsense. No huge company with competent legal experts are going to allow a policy of blatant personal property theft.

They're evil but they're not stupid.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] Carighan 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A youtube with an utterly idiotic grin on the front slide doesn't make it any less illegal.

Of course, in some jurisdictions their repair contract might hold water in a court. In most it won't, for example over here in Germany plenty of our law automatically invalidates lots of stuff a company might put in their EULAs or TOS. They are allowed to write it in there, but even if you explicitly click accept, it's invalid and has no legal bearing, as if it were simply not in there.

But I had something similar happen before actually, where the item was "lost" basically. Net result was getting a replacement and a free upgrade for personal use (that is, I got the same phone back which was my work phone, and the better model explicitly to use personally as an apology).

But that's the thing, they know it's cheaper to give 1 in 50000 people a free item and/or money in return for saving 1.2% on their personel cost and training cost for service centres. That's why they do this. They institutionalized the incompetence resulting from their lack of training and staffing.

[–] AndrewZabar 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You say you’re in Germany; that is all the difference. The U.S. and its legal system, government and lawmakers have all been bought and paid for. Big businesses do what they want here.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. Here in America, things being illegal doesn't stop people from breaking the law, and the biggest law breakers are giant corporations.

[–] AndrewZabar 2 points 5 months ago

I give it maybe two more republican presidencies before the corporations start rewriting the constitution.

[–] NateNate60 13 points 5 months ago (2 children)

You didn't read the article, did you? It's in their repair contract that you must agree to before sending things in for repair.

From a legal perspective, they didn't steal it...

...you gave it to them.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Depends. Where I live even signed contracts can be deemed illegal in parts if a clause is still seen as unexpected or surprising for the customer.

If Google included a clause that states the customer loses a kidney to them, wouldn't make it legal just because it's written there.

[–] NateNate60 0 points 5 months ago

It's legal in the United States where consumer protection laws aren't as strong as in some other places.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

You could be a serial killer making contracts with your victims, it would still be illegal.

[–] NateNate60 1 points 5 months ago

This one isn't though. There's no law against it in the United States, thus it is legal.

Murder contracts specifically are illegal because they contract for an illegal activity. Giving your phone to Google isn't an illegal activity. Yes, it sounds and feels like theft, but it doesn't meet the legal definition of theft.