Science Memes

11253 readers

5259 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.

Rules

Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
Keep it rooted (on topic).
No spam.
Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.

Research Committee

[email protected]

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

702

viruses (mander.xyz)

submitted 6 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

108 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Do it reproduce?

Not by themselves, no. They need to take over a cell's replication machinery for that.

Do it evolve?

Yes, as they are subject to natural selection.

Do it try to survive?

I don't think so, they don't try anything to do anything, they just are... but the same can probably be said for most actually living organisms, including many relatively complex ones, so I don't think it can be used as a way to determine if something is alive or not.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

But it did reproduce then no? Its just like how some organisms are surviving as a parasite. They need another thing to survive mostly as food. But in this case, as a reproduction method.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

The thing, though, is... you take a virus, put it in a petri dish by itself, and it does... nothing.

It doesn't have a metabolism, it doesn't look for a host, it doesn't do anything... it's just an inert clump of organic matter. (Then again, probably the same could be said for, say, spores. Or pollen. Or raw DNA or even RNA. Are those alive..?)

But plug it into a cell and... well, it sort of breaks apart, injecting it's RNA or DNA into the cell, and... that's it for that particular instance of the virus.

Sure, the cell will then take that genetic payload and unwittingly use it to fabricate as many copies of the virus as it can... but at that point the original virus instance is just an empty protein husk... is it still alive..? Does “being alive” maybe not apply to individual virus particles, but to this whole process..?

Maybe being alive is not just a binary, but a scale (or something more complex) where you can fit anything from crystals or prions to us and who knows what else, maybe whole ecosystems, maybe the Gaia concept of a living world...

But we humans certainly do seem to like our black and white binary choices, even if viruses might be a triangular peg we're trying to fit into either a round or square hole...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

I agree, the point is that we need to define "alive" itself clearly which as you stated, is currently beyond our understanding.

If being inert constitutes as not living then yes, virus is not alive. Their "evolution" is not because of their doing/needs but rather due to their construction. In that case I think virus is more akin to a poison. The substance itself can be not dangerous, but due to a metabolism process inside a specific organism/cell, it becomes a dangerous substance. The side effect in this case is just so happens to make another copy of the virus. But this process is prone to mutation as their building block is quite prone to do so, and we get the "evolution".

[–] theangryseal 2 points 6 months ago

Yours is the reply I like the most.

[–] rektdeckard 1 points 6 months ago

Most interesting definition, I think, comes from contrapposto. Can it die? No. So long as it retains its "shape" more or less, it functions. If heated or denatured, it no longer functions. More like broken than dead.