this post was submitted on 22 May 2024
-35 points (20.3% liked)

Conservative

382 readers
44 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

@LookBehindYouNowAndThen I'm not sure if he's a supremacist, more likely a racial separatist/"race realist". Wouldn't be shocked if he's racist, but yeah #TheProtocolsOfTheEldersOfZion is quite the deep cut, and his alt-right views are probably the only way he even knows what that is (I only know what that is when I started researching the origins of the #Israel v. #Palestine conflict and it came up as I was skimming #Wikipedia)

[–] LookBehindYouNowAndThen 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I don't make excuses for white supremicists.

Guess you do.

How the fuck is a "racial separatist" not a racist?

Gotta love how this community puts the full depravity of conservatism on display for everyone.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

@LookBehindYouNowAndThen

> I don’t make excuses for racists.

I don't either! I do try to understand them though. They walk among us, after all.

> How the fuck is a “racial separatist” not a racist?

They're still racist; the difference is that a white supremacist thinks that white people are better than other people, and racial separatists think that all races are equal, but should be segregated from each other.

[–] LookBehindYouNowAndThen 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Funny how you're more charitable to this white supremicist's views than you are for anyone to your left.

Last time we were having a discussion you misrepresented my views with every reply, but you've really dialed in the various flavors of racist, because those nuances are so important to understand.

Conservatives will ally with racists and fascists before they compromise with a lib.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@LookBehindYouNowAndThen

> Funny how you’re more charitable to this white supremicist’s views than you are for anyone to your left.

This is an interesting take. You must not know me very well.

Have you seen my political commentary blacklist of bad faith actors? It's mostly people on the right.

https://social.teci.world/objects/a591d729-7dd8-4374-b9c7-a31b9f5e56e9

> Last time we were having a discussion you misrepresented my views with every reply

Which convo was this?

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

@LookBehindYouNowAndThen

> Conservatives will ally with racists and fascists before they compromise with a lib.

Part of me wonders if I'm even a #Conservative anymore. I hate big government and a lot of them don't, and the #MAGA people are pretty embarrassing to boot.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Seems to me like as long as you're following your conscience and thinking for yourself it doesn't matter what you are labeled as.

Labels like that shift and change and some people expect you to shift and change with them, but do people really switch their beliefs on a dime like that? You believe what you believe, not what some label says you believe.

Moreover, the way the political statecraft becomes all encompassing is really harmful. "All within the state, nothing outside the state, nothing against the state" and "everything is political" are two sides of a coin we should melt down for scrap metal. For most of us, the most important questions aren't about some distant capitol, but what's around us and how we affect that.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@realcaseyrollins @LookBehindYouNowAndThen

Conservatism is a philosophy, not a party. We are realists, the Left are anti-realists.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

@amerika @LookBehindYouNowAndThen

> Conservatism is a philosophy

Fair enough; Conservatism is pretty broad so it can be as libertarian as it can be fascist.

I care too much about supporting small government and principles over people to want to associate too closely with the modern right, who I feel is increasingly okay with authoritarianism (look at their support of #DeSantis for example)

> We are realists, the Left are anti-realists.

That's kind of a childish way to view things.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

@realcaseyrollins @LookBehindYouNowAndThen

For me, getting away from Wikipedia is important. It's enemy propaganda. Britannica does a lot better for quality information anyway.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@realcaseyrollins @LookBehindYouNowAndThen

More likely just classically liberal with some culturally Christian conservative leanings.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@amerika @LookBehindYouNowAndThen Possibly. My right wing social values will never change because the #Bible does, but I care most about the Y-axis on the #PoliticalCompass. Can't get down with #Libertarianism because that's too extreme for me, unfortunately

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

@realcaseyrollins @LookBehindYouNowAndThen

Libertarianism is basically anarchy and that is dysfunctional.

But as an economic theory and a way of achieving indirect solutions it is great.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@realcaseyrollins @LookBehindYouNowAndThen

I disagree; egalitarianism is an anti-realist philosophy.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@amerika @LookBehindYouNowAndThen That's a different argument than the one you put forth though.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@realcaseyrollins @LookBehindYouNowAndThen

Egalitarianism is the root of the Left; it is an ideology. Conservatism is a folkway, which means we prefer time-proven solutions, which requires measurement by reality not human judgment. This naturally leads to a need for social order on a case-by-case basis anchored in a few general principles instead of One Big Idea.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@amerika @LookBehindYouNowAndThen

> Egalitarianism is the root of the Left

Are you sure about this?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@amerika @LookBehindYouNowAndThen Imagine a horse with two legs. Doesn't mean that four legs are what makes a horse a horse. That's a parts-to-whole fallacy.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@realcaseyrollins @LookBehindYouNowAndThen

The core philosophy of the Left is egalitarianism; this is inherent in their origin both in the ancient times and in Revolutionary France.

"left, in politics, the portion of the political spectrum associated in general with egalitarianism and popular or state control of the major institutions of political and economic life."

https://www.britannica.com/topic/left

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@realcaseyrollins @LookBehindYouNowAndThen

A couple more links:

https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/egalitarianism/

https://iep.utm.edu/egalitarianism/

These are about the philosophy, but you can see the divisions in Leftism from classical liberal through Communism play out in these arguments.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 5 months ago

@amerika @LookBehindYouNowAndThen I do know about #Egalitarianism because it has influenced some denominations of #Christianity unfortunately

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@LookBehindYouNowAndThen

In any case, his alt right views don't exactly map to this conversation, so I'll allow it for now.

If lemmy.world wants to ban him, they probably can, but he's on annihilation.social, which is a different instance entirely.

[–] LookBehindYouNowAndThen 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The mods have the power to ban anyone.

Notably, they don't ban the guy who hosts a blog with articles titled things like Being White: The Gradual Epiphany of a True Believer and thinks the Protocols of the Elders of Zion is a true conspiracy.

I've been banned for some pretty stupid shit, but this guy is welcome. That should tell you everything you need to know about this community.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

@LookBehindYouNowAndThen Report it to the mods. I'm on #Mastodon and I think he's on #Pleroma, so there's nothing I can do.

But I'm a freedom of speech homie so I wouldn't complain about it too much; if the speech offends you, you should be able to block or mute him yourself on your end.

[–] LookBehindYouNowAndThen 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I have reported them.

The mods only care about banning people who make conservatives face reality.

They're not going to ban this chode because they want him for a user.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 5 months ago

@LookBehindYouNowAndThen I guess we'll see. It's very possible that it's a free speech community and they won't ban him, which is fine. He doesn't need to be banned.