this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
998 points (98.0% liked)

World News

39035 readers
2958 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 201 points 6 months ago (4 children)

The CNN headline is a bit misleading. It's not the International Criminal Court as a whole that is seeking these arrest warrants but the ICC's chief prosecutor Karim Khan. The judges have yet to decide on these warrants.

[Side note: This is the same kind of lazy journalism that uses terms like EU chief or EU leader interchangeably for the President of the European Commission (Ursula von der Leyen) and the President of the European Council (Charles Michel). If this was limited to a short headline, I could excuse it, but CNN continues with the same wording in the first sentence of the article: "The International Criminal Court is seeking arrest warrants for ..." which is absolutely unnecessary, even if CNN clarifies things later.]

[–] [email protected] 75 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I've always considered CNN to stand for Clearly Not News

Edit - the BBC headline starts "ICC prosecutor seeks arrest of..."

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3ggpe3qj6wo

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Ok, this is very interesting. How is it he took this initiative? Actually, is it an initiative or part of the process?

[–] [email protected] 42 points 6 months ago (4 children)

It's part of the process. Now the request is before judges who will decide whether or not to issue the arrest warrants. For reference, when an ICC prosecutor asked for an arrest warrant for Vladmir Putin, it took a couple months for the judges to decide and then issue the warrant.

[–] Eatspancakes84 8 points 6 months ago

Yeah, the process is slow but thorough (as it should be since these are among the most difficult cases in existence).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Thank you, good to know!

[–] magnetosphere 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I know nothing about the process. How can a decision take months? What else are they doing? Are there counter arguments or something happening in the meantime?

[–] Treczoks 6 points 6 months ago

The judges have to read and verify the documents they got for this case. This takes some weeks to months.

[–] jaybone 0 points 6 months ago (1 children)

And good thing Putin is rotting in a prison cell right now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

hopefully his helicopter will crash into the foggy mountains or his train to china/north korea will derail

[–] DPRK_Official 1 points 6 months ago

Trains do not derail in North Korea. It is forbidden.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Modern Journalism, and I use that term loosely, at work. Once you notice these kinds of misleading to incorrect headlines you can't stop seeing them.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim 8 points 6 months ago

I think that's a distinction without a difference. How would the ICC seek an arrest warrant if not by having the chief prosecutor submit one? If the court had approved it, the title would be "arrest warrant issued by ICC".