this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
126 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19232 readers
3777 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rapidcreek -1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The scenario of a split is interesting but very low probability since there are Democraticame Senators who can make sure that doesn't happen by their vote. I imagine there will be Democratic Senators voting for this bill. It's not what they do that's important, it's what Republicans do. Johnson won't bring it to the floor for the s reasons he didn't last time. Trump told him not to.

[–] givesomefucks -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

The scenario of a split is interesting but very low probability since there are Democraticame Senators who can make sure that doesn’t happen by their vote.

How does your math work?

It takes a single D senator cough Joe Manchin cough voting for this for it to pass the Senate, then it will pass the Republican House.

You realize there are consequences for this that will last decades if it's ever overturned?

This ain't a fucking game, this effects peoples lives. It effects if people will live...

And playing with them like they're pawns is something republicans do, Dems joining in hurts their turnout and when turnout is low, republicans win.

If it's just political.points to show republicans won't do anything, why not use healthcare?

Why use something that if literally anything goes different than expected, republicans win?

[–] jordanlund 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

In a perfect world things could pass with a 50 vote + Kamala Harris majority, but the Senate has failed to operate like that since they engaged the filibuster death penalty in 2009 when Obama was elected.

60 votes are needed to proceed on ANYTHING in the Senate and with a 50/50 split, the votes from the other side just aren't there.

[–] givesomefucks 2 points 7 months ago

Wasn't it McConnell who did some shit like this, then when it was actually going to pass he had to filibuster his own bill?

Like 90% sure it was him