this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
63 points (93.2% liked)

Louis Rossmann

401 readers
1 users here now

Louis Rossmann Community on Lemmy.world: For fans/supporters of Louis Rossmann and his work

About Louis Rossmann

Louis Rossmann is a repair shop owner and a vocal supporter of the Right To Repair movement. He runs a YouTube channel with a variety of content - from board repair videos, to news and updates in the technology space.

His insightful and reasonable opinions on technology and product ownership tend to attract a lot of attention.

Community Guidelines

  1. Be nice
  2. Respect others' perspectives
  3. No advertising
  4. Follow the rules of the instance we're hosted on: https://mastodon.world/about

Interested in being a moderator for this community? Positions are currently open.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
lemann
LemannHelperBot
[email protected]
[email protected]
63
Piracy is Morally Justified after Telstra Locked Customer Purchases Behind New Hardware [13:43 | May 14 24 | Louis Rossmann] (youtu.be)
submitted 7 months ago by jimmydoreisalefty to c/louisrossmann
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Short Summary

  1. Louis Rossmann discusses an article from The Guardian about ownership of movies and TV shows in the age of streaming services.
  2. The article addresses the intricacies of ownership in technically savvy fields that normal users may not be aware of.
  3. Purchasers of media are often treated worse than pirates, and may be viewed as second-class citizens or criminals.
  4. Companies may take away perpetual licenses and upcharge for 4K content.
  5. Netflix only allows viewing on smart TVs, which may spy on users.
  6. Sony and Amazon use revocable licenses and restrict access to purchased content.
  7. Vicky Russell spent $2,500 on media but was told she didn't actually own it and needed to purchase new hardware to access it.
  8. Terms of service state that purchased or rented content is only accessible through the service and may be lost if the account is terminated or suspended.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

And what makes the purchaser being viewed like a criminal?

[โ€“] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

When the content purchaser encounters arbitration of access to the content they purchased, the implication is that they didn't genuinely purchase it. It can't really be separated that the material effect of the DRM mechanism being encountered is to inform purchasers that they are attempting to commit a crime.