this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
452 points (97.5% liked)

World News

32285 readers
1226 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] efstajas 21 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Why are you assuming that her mental situation developed as a result of society or "the government"? The article mentions that her conditions are chronic and started developing in early childhood. People can have mental conditions without any particular external trigger.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

She has trauma, according to the article. Most traumas are largely systemic issues that have been improperly handled.

[–] efstajas 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Fair enough — though the trauma is also just one of the named conditions, and we have no idea what that trauma was caused by.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

Depression and anxiety are also heavily influenced by societal conditions. She would probably still have to deal with these issues but to a much less QoL damaging extent under a more humane system.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

True, but people are also influenced by society starting from a young age.

The Netherlands does have a slightly higher than average suicide rate. Maybe it is because they allow euthanasia, so it's just easier than other similar countries ... I don't know.

I have mixed feelings too, like the poster you are responding to, but it is her choice. We let people sign up to potentially die to join the military when they aren't even adults yet. This was a decision made with the support of loved ones and caregivers.

[–] garbagebagel 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The Netherlands does have a slightly higher than average suicide rate. Maybe it is because they allow euthanasia, so it's just easier than other similar countries ... I don't know.

This is speculated in the wiki as well and honestly I'm conflicted on it too. If people are choosing it more when it's more readily available, does that necessarily reflect badly on the people providing it? or does it reflect worse on the societies where people are suffering so badly that they probably would choose suicide if it was easier?

In a kind of parallel way to abortion here, ban abortion and you get lower abortion rates but higher rates of poverty and lower education rates. Safe abortion options lead to higher abortion rates, but the quality of life is better for those that make the choice to do it safely.

Of course in this case it's a bit different because the quality of life in assisted death is no life, but is no life better than a fucking miserable one?

It's a lot to think about but, like others in this thread, i generally believe the majority of today's mental health problems (specifically depression, anxiety, and to some extent addiction) are systemic societal problems. I know others disagree and I'm not trying to be dismissive of people's very real mental health struggles, but I mean that they are caused systemically in the way lung cancer became more common because of cigarettes. Our environment affects us.