Political Videos

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/23858780

Generated Summary of Video Below:

Joe Biden's Leadership and Public Perception

• The discussion opens with a critique of President Joe Biden's leadership, suggesting that many decisions made during his presidency are not genuinely his own.
• The speaker points out Biden's physical presence and performance during a press conference, where he appeared disoriented while reading from a teleprompter, indicating a lack of functionality in his role as president.
• The speaker emphasizes that the current state of the presidency reflects a significant scandal, as they believe the country has not had a functional president for an extended period.

Presidential Citizens Medal Recipients

• The White House recently announced the recipients of the Presidential Citizens Medal, which is awarded to individuals who have performed exemplary deeds of service for their country.
• Among the recipients is Liz Cheney, who the speaker argues is being honored by the Democrats as they leave the White House.
• The White House justified Cheney's selection by highlighting her two decades of public service, including her role as vice chair of the committee investigating the January 6 attack.
• The speaker notes that Biden's remarks about Cheney focus on her commitment to defending American ideals such as freedom, dignity, and decency.

Liz Cheney's Reception and Political Influence

• During the ceremony where Cheney received her medal, the speaker describes an enthusiastic reception from Biden's staff and Democratic luminaries, likening it to adoration typically reserved for pop culture icons.
• The speaker suggests that Cheney has become a significant figure within the Democratic Party, indicating that she could potentially run for president in 2028 and be a formidable candidate.
• Despite her past as a Republican, the speaker argues that Cheney's actions and public support have garnered her significant admiration among Democrats.

Contradictions in Political Alliances

• The speaker reflects on the historical context of Liz Cheney's political career, noting that her rise is largely due to her father's legacy, Dick Cheney, who was previously vilified by Democrats.
• The speaker points out that Liz Cheney has consistently upheld her father's policies, which have been criticized as authoritarian and dangerous.
• The narrative suggests that Cheney's political positions have not strayed far from those of her father, despite her recent accolades from the Democratic establishment.

Biden's Past Critique of Dick Cheney

• The speaker recalls Biden's past statements while campaigning for vice president, where he described Dick Cheney as one of the most dangerous vice presidents in American history, highlighting the perceived threat of his consolidation of power.
• Biden's remarks are contrasted with his later actions, including attending a ceremony honoring Dick Cheney, which the speaker interprets as indicative of the theatrical nature of political rivalries.
• The speaker argues that such political theater obscures the true relationships and alliances that exist between establishment politicians across party lines.

Liz Cheney's Role in Foreign Policy and Military Engagements

• The discussion shifts to Liz Cheney's advocacy for maintaining military presence in Afghanistan, particularly opposing the withdrawal negotiated by Donald Trump.
• The speaker highlights Cheney's reliance on discredited claims regarding Russian bounties on American soldiers to justify her stance against withdrawal, indicating a pattern of misleading narratives in her arguments.
• Cheney's statements about American adversaries and military responses are presented as part of a broader pro-war narrative that the speaker critiques as harmful and dishonest.

Defending the Iraq War and Its Consequences

• The speaker examines Liz Cheney's defense of the Iraq War, asserting that her arguments are rooted in the same discredited narratives that led to widespread public distrust in government.
• Cheney's continued support for her father's policies is portrayed as an attempt to uphold a legacy that the speaker believes contributed to significant harm and loss of life.
• The speaker emphasizes that Cheney's political career is intertwined with her defense of these controversial policies, raising questions about the integrity of her current political positions.

Conclusion and Reflection on Political Dynamics

• The closing remarks reflect on the complexities of political dynamics, particularly how historical relationships and past criticisms can shift over time.
• The speaker suggests that the admiration for Liz Cheney from the Democratic establishment is indicative of deeper ideological alignments that transcend traditional party lines.
• Ultimately, the discussion calls for critical examination of political narratives and the motivations behind public figures' actions and statements.

Independent, Unencumbered Analysis and Investigative Reporting, Captive to No Dogma or Faction.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/23789888

Generated Summary of Video Below:

Introduction to Tony Greenstein

• Tony Greenstein is introduced as the son of an orthodox Rabbi and a writer for various publications including The Guardian and Electronic Intifada.
• He has authored significant works such as "Fighting Fascism in Brighton and the South Coast," and contributed to books on philosophy and ethics.
• His notable book, "Zionism During the Holocaust: The Weaponization of Memory in the Service of State and Nation," is highly recommended by the host.

Recent Arrest and Political Climate

• Tony discusses his recent arrest on December 20th, which was prompted by a tweet he posted that allegedly supported the prescribed organization Hamas.
• He notes that the charges have since been adjusted but emphasize the use of anti-terrorism laws to suppress Palestinian support.
• Tony highlights that this trend of using anti-terrorism laws is affecting many individuals who express solidarity with Palestinians, equating such support to terrorism.
• He references a fellow activist, Haim Bashid Zubir, who faced similar consequences for his comments at a protest against the Israeli ambassador.

Details of Arrest and Charges

• Tony reveals that he was arrested based on a tweet where he expressed support for Palestinians and mentioned Hamas as part of the Palestinian resistance.
• He recalls making a controversial comparison between Israel and Nazi Germany during a protest, which led to accusations of racially aggravated offenses.
• After eight hours in custody, he was released, and the police later informed him that they would not pursue charges related to the racially aggravated offense.
• Tony is currently facing serious anti-terrorism charges, which could lead to a lengthy prison sentence, and he is awaiting further court proceedings.

Legal Context and Freedom of Speech

• The conversation shifts to the legal context of free speech in the UK, where Tony notes the absence of a First Amendment equivalent.
• He argues that even in the US, free speech is not absolute and is being increasingly restricted by court rulings.
• Tony cites Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights as a supposed protection for free speech, but expresses skepticism about its enforcement in practice.
• He critiques the role of police and courts in the UK, suggesting that they often act in alignment with the interests of those in power rather than upholding justice.

Discussion on Palestinian Treatment and Anti-Semitism

• The discussion touches upon the treatment of Palestinians, particularly those without prominent platforms, and the challenges faced by Palestinian and Arab British individuals.
• Tony mentions that in Germany, a significant number of individuals arrested under anti-Semitism laws are Jewish, highlighting the irony in the situation.
• He argues that Jewish identity is often politicized, where those who do not support the state of Israel are rendered invisible and accused of contributing to anti-Semitism.
• Tony concludes by asserting that Jews are often used as a moral cover for imperialist actions in the Middle East, which complicates their identity in political discourse.

Tony Greenstein is the co-founder of Britain's Palestine solidarity campaign and the author of "Zionism During the Holocaust: The Weaponisation of Memory in the Service of State and Nation."

1. 00:00:00 Tony's bio
2. 00:00:50 Tony's arrest over comments about Hamas
3. 00:02:12 arrest of Haim Bresheeth
4. 00:02:42 Tony's arrest-worthy words
5. 00:03:20 Tony said "Israel is Hitler's bastard offspring"
6. 00:04:20 Tony's two different charges
7. 00:06:04 Is it fair to arrest people for speech if there's no guaranteed freedom of speech?
8. 00:06:56 Germany violating its own laws in order to punish criticism of Israel
9. 00:07:25 justice under capitalism is justice for those who rule not those who are ruled
10. 00:07:28 more Jews are being disproportionately punished under antisemitism laws
11. 00:08:20 Zionist Jews don't see antizionist Jews as really Jewish
12. 00:08:22 "for them being Jewish means supporting a racist and apartheid state which serves imperialism's purposes 00:08:44 "Jews are the moral alibi for imperialism in the Middle East"

Creating a Weekly Lefty Livestream & Podcast with Katie Halper

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/17197150

1. Gen. Wesley Clark, Democracy Now! interview, 2007. Objective: take out 7 countries in 5 years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Iran.

Noticed terms on /videos and this might be considered political, so I'm also posting here in case the first gets taken down. I don't think this is politics. Just racist assholes getting what's coming to them. But I realize that my views may not be the same as others.

Here’s some holiday cheer for you. Racist nazis coming back from a demonstration find their cars vandalized.

Who could possibly disagree with nazis?! /s Reminder:

Worth noting, Patriot Front had a huge leak of data in 2022.

Patriot Front Fascist Leak Exposes Nationwide Racist Campaigns

You can download it at the following torrent address:

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:2c87816e4c81990fb25bbca43dd8d578eaa55886&dn=patriotfront&tr=udp%3A%2F%2F9.rarbg.to%3A2920&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Ftracker.opentrackr.org%3A1337&tr=udp%3A%2F%2Fexodus.desync.com%3A6969

I happen to be seeding this on a permanent basis. I have a gigabit uplink. Please leach and share. Expose these fucks.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/23366029

Summary of video below:

Introduction to the Uhuru Movement and Legal Challenges

• The discussion begins with a reflection on the Uhuru movement and its leader, [Omali Yeshitela], highlighting that it has been almost two years since the last conversation on this topic.
• [Omali Yeshitela] and two associates faced serious legal charges, which were seen as a significant free speech issue, particularly given the history of the Department of Justice targeting black organizations and activists.
• The DOJ's case against [Yeshitela] and the Uhuru 3 included allegations of conspiracy with Russia, which was deemed absurd as it was based on mere speculation about their thoughts regarding potential payments from Russia.

Court Hearing and Sentencing Outcome

• The court hearing concluded with a positive outcome for [Yeshitela], as he faced no prison time or fines, marking a significant victory for the Uhuru movement and free speech advocates.
• Judge William Jung announced that none of the Uhuru 3 would serve time in prison, and the courtroom erupted with applause and celebration from supporters present.
• Although the Uhuru 3 were sentenced to three years of probation and required to complete 300 hours of community service, the absence of jail time was considered a substantial win.

Legal Implications and First Amendment Rights

• The judge acknowledged the case's implications for First Amendment rights, highlighting that the charges stemmed from the requirement to register as foreign agents, which he found to infringe upon free speech.
• The judge's comments emphasized that without the foreign agent registration requirement, the actions of the defendants would be legal and protected under free speech.
• The outcome was viewed as a victory for the broader fight against what many see as unjust government repression of free speech and political activism.

Community Reactions and Celebrations

• The reaction from the community was overwhelmingly positive, with expressions of joy and relief that the Uhuru 3 would not face imprisonment.
• Supporters from various political backgrounds gathered to celebrate the verdict, showcasing a united front in support of free speech and the Uhuru movement.
• [Omali Yeshitela] expressed gratitude for the support received, emphasizing that their fight was not just for themselves but for all who advocate for justice and free speech.

Statements from Key Figures

• [Omali Yeshitela]'s granddaughter spoke about the significance of the verdict, highlighting the absence of prison time and fines as a major relief for their family and supporters.
• Caleb Mopin, representing the Center for Political Innovation, called for a full pardon for the Uhuru 3 and criticized the Foreign Agents Registration Act as an oppressive law that needs to be overturned.
• Scott Ritter also spoke at the gathering, emphasizing the importance of free speech and the need for solidarity among various movements to combat government overreach.

Conclusion and Broader Implications

• The case of the Uhuru 3 is seen as emblematic of larger issues facing activists and organizations that challenge government narratives and policies.
• The outcome of this case serves as a reminder of the precarious nature of free speech rights and the potential for government action against those who dissent.
• The celebration of this verdict reflects a collective determination to protect civil liberties and advocate for justice in the face of systemic oppression.

#uhuruthreefreed #sabbysabs #uhuruthreenews #scottritterlatestspeech #uhurunewstoday #geopoliticsinconflict

Leftist news commentary and interviews. Fighting for political and social change. Sabby Sabs podcast is a part of Revolutionary Blackout Network.

cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/14326001 (so please comment there rather than here?)

It's only ~5 minutes long, and very worth a watch imho.

@4:31: "liberal democracy has been marked by its emphasis on procedures, not outcomes - we honor the process, even when we dislike the outcome; the drive to quickly get what we want even at the cost of bypassing procedures and undermining institutions is deeply dangerous"

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/23141738

New York Times Inquiry into Rumble

- A New York Times reporter named Stuart Thompson initiated contact with various Rumble show hosts regarding a story about Rumble's content and audience.
- Notably, he did not reach out to the narrator, despite their significant presence on the platform, which highlights a selective approach in his reporting.
- The email sent by Thompson indicated that the story would cover the contrasting perspectives on Rumble compared to traditional news sources, including the New York Times.
- Thompson claimed to have consumed Rumble content exclusively for a week to gain expertise on the platform, which the narrator criticized as insufficient for a thorough understanding.
- The email included references to alleged disinformation propagated by Rumble shows, particularly targeting Dan Bongino and others.

Reactions from Rumble Hosts

- The narrator discussed the general apathy towards inquiries from the New York Times, noting that many recipients of Thompson's email did not respond, reflecting a loss of influence from traditional media.
- He pointed out that in the past, a New York Times inquiry would have caused panic among those involved, but now it elicits indifference.
- Despite the lack of responses, the New York Times published the article, which the narrator described as creatively constructed but lacking substantial engagement from those it targeted.

Characterization of Rumble

- The narrator expressed frustration over Rumble being labeled as a right-wing platform, arguing that it serves as a free speech site that accommodates a wide range of political views, including leftist content.
- He emphasized that many creators on Rumble do not align with right-wing ideologies, challenging the narrative that the platform is exclusively conservative.
- The term "right-wing" has become synonymous with free speech in the current media landscape, which the narrator argues misrepresents the platform's diverse content.

Stuart Thompson's Qualifications

- Thompson's credentials as a disinformation expert were called into question, particularly his claim of having monitored right-wing media for four years as a basis for his authority on the subject.
- The narrator highlighted that Thompson's method of gaining expertise by watching 47 hours of Rumble content in a week was insufficient and overly simplistic.
- He criticized the notion that merely consuming content qualifies someone as an expert, suggesting that true expertise requires deeper analytical skills and understanding.

Critique of Mainstream Media

- The narrator asserted that mainstream media, particularly the New York Times, has a history of disseminating disinformation, which undermines its credibility to judge other platforms.
- He referenced past instances where the New York Times reported misleading information, such as the Iraq War and the Russia investigation, to illustrate their flawed track record.
- The narrator argued that the decline in public trust towards mainstream media is a result of their own actions and biases, rather than the rise of alternative platforms like Rumble.

Rumble's Role in the Media Landscape

- Rumble was described as a platform that emerged in response to increasing censorship from big tech companies, particularly against conservative voices, during events such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
- The narrator pointed out that Rumble's appeal extends beyond conservative users, as it also attracts individuals from the left who seek a space free from censorship.
- The platform's mission is framed as restoring freedom of expression on the internet, allowing users to share diverse viewpoints without fear of removal based on political bias.

Conclusion on Rumble's Identity

- The narrator concluded that labeling Rumble as a right-wing site is misleading and fails to acknowledge the variety of content available on the platform.
- He emphasized that Rumble hosts shows from a wide spectrum of political beliefs, including leftist and centrist perspectives, which contradicts the singular narrative of it being a right-wing platform.
- The ongoing discourse about Rumble reflects broader tensions in the media regarding free speech and the classification of political ideologies in the digital age.

Independent, Unencumbered Analysis and Investigative Reporting, Captive to No Dogma or Faction.

Article: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/12/13/business/rumble-trump-bongino-kirk.html

Alt. Archive Link 1: https://archive.ph/a5hfm

Alt. Archive Link 2: https://web.archive.org/web/20241213182957/https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/12/13/business/rumble-trump-bongino-kirk.html

NewsNation's Alex Caprariello and Ashleigh Banfield conduct an ad-hoc interview with inmates across the fence at the State Correctional Institution in Huntingdon, PA, where Luigi Mangione is currently held. 11 Dec 2024.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/22814668

Hi. Well, we're doing this again.... I guess. So, let's ask the tough question: are Americans just plain stupid for electing Donald Trump?

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/22739163

Short Summary

1. The discussion centers around a social media post by President-elect Donald Trump, asserting that BRICS countries should not attempt to create a new currency or move away from the US dollar, threatening them with 100% tariffs if they do.
2. Michael Tracy critiques the notion that Trump has any affinity for BRICS or desires to diminish US hegemonic power, arguing instead that Trump is an enforcer of the unipolar world.
3. The conversation highlights Trump's previous statements about maintaining the dollar as the world's reserve currency and his extreme stance on tariffs, particularly against China.
4. Speakers express skepticism about Trump's leadership style, suggesting he is more of a performer than a strategic leader, influenced by those around him.
5. Clint Russell from the Libertarian Party is mentioned, asking for arguments regarding Trump's controversial tariff proposals.
6. The perceived foolishness of Trump's policy of imposing 100% tariffs on Chinese imports is discussed, with commentators hesitant to express their true opinions for fear of losing subscribers.
7. Criticism is directed at Trump's approach, arguing that other world leaders are more serious and strategic than he is.
8. The discussion includes various viewer responses expressing concerns about the negative impact of such tariffs on the US economy, suggesting it would lead to increased prices and expose weaknesses in domestic production.
9. The speakers argue that the US has harmed itself by weaponizing the petrodollar, leading to a loss of global trust.
10. The conversation concludes with the suggestion that the US has become a destabilizing force globally, with allies seeking ways to mitigate the impact of American decline.

the post-civilization left

Due Dissidence is a multimedia one-stop shop for left politics and gallows humor in written, audio, and video form.