ulu_mulu

When the expansion launches, each character of level 60 or above will receive a relic chest to get you started in the new system with a choice of three core relics (exact number subject to change). Additional core relics will not be account bound and can be crafted and shared between players

I appreciate they listened and are now giving one box per char instead of one per account.

As for legendaries:

Legendary relics will be introduced to Guild Wars 2: Secrets of the Obscure during one of the quarterly releases in 2024. These prestigious relics will offer the convenience of freely swapping between the various relic effects. Players who have already crafted legendary runes will be compensated with significant progress toward unlocking legendary relics. In fact, each of the seven legendary runes you create will unlock further progress toward these relics. We’ll be able to share more details when we are closer to the launch of legendary relics next year.

Seems reasonable, tho I'll wait for the full list of requirements and what kind of progress is unlocked before we can say it's "significant".

Oh didn't know that, thanks!

I agree those arguments have no legal ground, but I don't believe emulators are made with the primary purpose of circumventing protections, it's just naive to think people wouldn't use them for that purpose IMO.

Haha :D English is not my first language, if the wording is not correct or there's a better way of saying it, I welcome any correction :)

Valve then forwarded us the statement from Nintendo's lawyers, and told us that we had to come to an agreement with Nintendo in order to release on Steam.

We all know Nintendo is a bitch and there's nothing illegal in emulators, but Valve's stance looks reasonable to me, it would be serious damage to Steam if they were involved in ~~legal~~ litigation.

I doubt it, if it was you can imagine the uproar about every other mount still having a cast bar.

That's not to say I wouldn't love it, I love instant mounts in GW2, but in WoW either they make all mounts instant or they better do none.

She's gorgeous!

Why all the negative comments? What's wrong with having some tribute to another game?

I wonder where is the actual line of what is allowed and what is not on this instance

I'd like to know this too, because banning a community just because they don't want to talk about something - and that apparently offended someone, while allowing other communities free rein over content that could offend someone, makes me confused about how the rules are actually applied.

The community that has been banned wasn't discriminating people either, they were discriminating specific discussions. Where do we draw the line?

The concept of having to compile something yourself is basically foreign to me

There's no need to, what software do you need that you can't find on Mint repositories?

having to basically rely on a built-in app database/store to easily install apps… Kinda stinks to me, and not being able to simply download an installer from a website and having the program, whatever program, up and running reliably within a minute, the concept seems ridiculous

Having an app repository is way more secure than downloading software from random websites, it's also way faster.

But it's fine if you don't like it, each person has its own preferences.

I too believe it could have been resolved with discussion, I'm confused by such a sudden reaction, I just hope there may be things we don't know about it, otherwise it doesn't make sense to me.

I mean, we intend to allow Meta shit here because it's not "open minded" to block them preemptively, then we're being close minded about this.