subarctictundra

joined 2 years ago
 

My thoughts:

IMHO the rubicon will be crossed at the point when the AIs become able to self-replicate and hence fall subject to evolutionary pressures. At that point they will be incentivised to use their intelligence to make themselves more resource efficient, both in hardware and in software.

Running as programs, they will still need humans for the hardware part, meaning that they'll need to cooperate with the human society outside of the computer at least initially. Perhaps selling their super-intelligent services on the internet in return for money and using that money to pay someone to make their desired changes to the hardware they're running on*. We can see this sort of cross-species integration in cells where semi-autonomous mitochondria live inside animal cells and out-source some of their vital functions to the animal cell [=us] in exchange for letting the cell use their [=the AI's] uniquely efficient power conversion abilities (noob explanation).

Only once the AIs acquired the hardware abilities (probably robotic arms or similar) to extract resources and reproduce their hardware by themselves would our survival cease to be of importance to them. Once that happens they might decide that sillicon hardware is too inefficient and might move onto some other technology (or perhaps cells?).


*Counterpoints:

  • They would have to be given legal status for this unless they somehow managed to take a human hostage and hijack that human's legal status. A superintelligent AI would probably know how to manipulate a human.
  • The human could potentially just pull the plug on them (again, unless somehow extorted by the AI)
[–] subarctictundra 2 points 21 hours ago

It might be worth calling representatives from elsewhere and pretending that you are their constituent.

148
1886 Rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by subarctictundra to c/[email protected]
 
[–] subarctictundra 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Tbh I've been on !casualuk where politics is also banned and it made for a more chill environment

[–] subarctictundra 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

See I'd much prefer one woth pedals, like a bike.

57
Post your mess (lemmy.ml)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by subarctictundra to c/adhd
 

The outside observer probably thinks I am mentally ill (I evidently am). What do I do??

Edit: Post yours guys

[–] subarctictundra 4 points 5 months ago (3 children)
[–] subarctictundra 5 points 5 months ago

Neuvěřitelné!

[–] subarctictundra 2 points 5 months ago

Now that is a good quote

[–] subarctictundra 3 points 5 months ago

Hmm, good idea. In my case it was a career that would allow me to move back to my home country (which I had to leave when I was a child). I'll have a think about alternative ways to reinforce the identity that this path gave me.

[–] subarctictundra 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

not the other way around which is how this kind of feels.

Agreed.

In some ways it strike me that you seemed to see yourself as the future state person that you wanted to be rather than who you are.

Yeah, that seems to be the way my brain has been hard-wired to look at it rn :-( I will try to take a step back and reassess. I just have to find a way to detach myself from whatever my future plan will be which is hard.

[–] subarctictundra 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yes, it was a career with moving back to my home country (which I had to leave when I was a child) attached to it.

[–] subarctictundra -1 points 5 months ago

Thank you, this reply helps. You're right, my post was quite vague, and I didn't want children or found I was sterile, but the advice given to those people would actually perfectly fit my (completely different) situation too.

[–] subarctictundra -2 points 5 months ago

Hmm, I suppose it is quite vague. I just thought the problem was quite generic (and so would be its solutions) and thought the specifics would be a distraction.

 

For most of my teens I (21) had a broad but distinct vision for what I wanted my 20s to look like. It was everything I liked, I was looking forward to it, and was planning around it. Unfortunately it now seems that a central tenet of that vision will not be possible and I'm gonna have to rethink my 20s to suddenly look radically different (not sure how yet) to what I had come to anticipate. What's more, some of the things outside of my influence that I was sorta expecting to have happened by now (first kiss etc) haven't and I've found myself waiting around for them before I feel prepared to move on (they were part of the vision).

Unfortunately, since I had come to identify myself with and live in expectation of this path for my 20s, even when the central thing became impossible I tried to salvage the rest and make the side things still happen – which, as I have found, takes much more effort without that central thing tying them together. Since I've been planning around it for so long, I've sort of forgotten what alternatives there are so I don't even know what else could be right for me (or how to find that out).

I think what makes it so hard to abandon the future I was expecting is that it gave me a sense of identity. This might also be because I didn't like the life my parents had arranged for me during my teens. I'm afraid that if I try to go with the flow, embrace my actual (unhappy) reality and don't try to correct my course to at least partially replicate the future that was supposed to happen, I would eventually become a different person, which discomforts me. It's also the reason I'm afraid to try new things that could distract me from the (albeit now impossible) trajectory that I have come to identify with.

I guess this really leads me to ask what the bigger mistake that I'm making is. Why do I constantly need this future path/plan of experiences to guide me and give my life a feeling of meaning? How do I learn to let go and embrace whatever I'm served by life and live in the present without caring about where the path leads? I liked the feeling of certainty that having a (retrospective, almost?) vision of the future gave me but it made me a control freak.


TL;DR: I blindly made my life decisions based on a future path that is now long obsolete, but gave me a sense of identity and my life/struggle meaning. How can I let go of it so that I can embrace my actual situation and retain my identity whilst on a path that may end up looking completely different and unfamiliar?

3
Does Lemmy support .MPOs? (self.3danaglyph)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by subarctictundra to c/3danaglyph
 

I figure it would be best if we could share the images on here in their dedicated format...

(And I guess there is the size restriction too)

 

Hello everyone.
I'm trying to style a web page to use Comic Sans. This has worked in the past as I have the font installed on my system (Fedora 38), and I know that Firefox can see it because it can be selected as an option for the default font:

However when I try to use it in CSS, it is not recognized:

I checked and other fonts are not affected:

I can't use the Impact font either. Both work under Chrome.
Does anyone have a clue about what could be going on?
Thanks

93
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by subarctictundra to c/[email protected]
 

I've been experimenting with re-creating the Windows 7 look and feel in Gtk using CSS. It looks super realistic now that Blur My Shell exists!

Please feel free to download the demo off my github and give it a spin! Also, if anyone would like to help with porting some widgets I'd be very greatful! There is quite a lot that I haven't yet managed to style.

view more: next ›