Why do you hope they die? It's not the next one in lune is going to be any better.
spindrift
joined 2 years ago
Sure, this can sort of get the job done with somewhat bad results.
The icons in my case were complex, so a single click with magic wand wound not select all of the parts .
Expand by 4 blurs the icons at the edges. This is actually pretty bad, and would result in lost detail and a washed out look.
The operation in gimp is destructive, so tweaking in multiple steps is not really possible, and creates a bad workflow.
No, Gimp is terrible and not up to the task at all.
Photopea is amazing. Its 90% a clone of PS and is sooo much better than gimp.
I used it today to remove a white background on some of our icons to get a transparent png.
It was as easy as going i to the layer options, blend options, and drag the slider. It even has the option that you can hold alt and split the slider in 2 to get transparency blend as a gradient.
This would be a nightmare in gimp, and photopea does it non destructively. And since its a web app you dont even have to install anything. Amazing.
It's so cool that P can phone home an image to figure out whats wrong.
Halp. Are my teeth OK?
China once again investing in african infrastructure.
Skandale at vi ikke har et fungerende tognett med doble linjer fra nord til sør.
It is! And much bigger than I thought it would be. We're having a great time here.
Is this RLM?
What the hell! Top tier trolling!
Saturation and exposure isnt really "editing", because all photos must be developed from the raw data. Most of the time your camera develops it automatically (and often get things slightly wrong), and many people like to develop raw photos themselves vith apps like snapseed.
Oversaturated photos should be considered flawed, but not disqualified.
Imo.
Also how are the creators supposed to get paid for their work if everything is free?
People here seem to think ads are just a vile cash grab from google, but in fact most of the ad revenue goes directly to the creators.