recursive_recursion

ehhh I dunno

feels like I just made a fool out of myself in public😬

You're already doing what a good moderator separates you one from an average one: engage, explain and adapt!

much appreciated🤗

The issue here is that marking articles like these as NSFW perpetuates the core issue of the content discussed: that this is a woman problem that should be talked about in private.

I guess that's where the majority of downvotes come from as well: "this should not be viewed in the workplace" is a catastrophic signal in this context for the message.

yeaaa I can totally see where my request would be problematic to say the least

All of this is my personal opinion of course but I wanted to leave you with more than just a two word comment!

Yup and Thank you!🤗

• all the points you made felt solid and made sense to me

based on your and other commentors I feel like I have a better grasp on future moderation decisions

for today, I def fucked up so this is a learning momement for me

again thank you for commenting!🤗🌻

As stated, images are reasonable to blur, because having them in your screen would Not be Safe For Work. Text generally doesn't really make sense to blur, especially an article published by a major news source. If it could be seen in print sitting on a lobby coffee table, it probably doesn't qualify as NSFW.

yup, I agree with all of your points

Text generally doesn't really make sense to blur, especially an article published by a major news source.

also while rereading this I realized that I'm not really sure what the mainstream concensus decision is when it comes to NSFW text-based content

• I know Fifty Shades was referenced/used in an episode of The Office

so maybe it's fine?🤔? not too sure

ahhh ok honestly can understand that

thank you for commenting!

The line is crossed when the purpose of the material is to titillate.

this'll help me figure out what does and doesn't cross the line🤗

whoops my b

didn't see @[email protected]'s previous post that's exactly the same thing so I'm gonna delete this post

again sorry, that's totally on me!

?

apologies but I don't understand,

• marking a post as NSFW would mean that users who've enabled to view/blur NSFW posts would have their choices be respected

the post is still viewable

maybe the norm has changed for what's NSFW and what's not NSFW?

edit:
after thinking about this some more I feel like I need more thoughts from people to figure out what's the right decision, trying to figure out content moderation is hard as I'm not perfect at this (I'm just a volunteer with no formal training)

• just trying to respect people's autonomy at the end of the day

how is IBM of all companies so progressive in terms of donations but is extremely shortsighted when it comes to user/customer support????

• Redhat enshitification (controversial anti-RHEL downstreaming)

I REALLY didn't expect an 89% from IBM

I think my workplace would be more concerned about the fact that their own sex toy shopping is tracked than the fact that I use sex toys.

fair enough

But I marked it as NSFW anyway.

Thank you!

dude it's literally about sex toys

if you can view this at work I gotta say your workplace is pretty awesome/progressive than most places

I can't stop laughing at how awful this looks😂

gives me Lynchian vibes

fuck yeah✊