randomdeadguy

joined 2 years ago
[–] randomdeadguy 50 points 3 months ago

Makes too much sense, probably the victim's fault instead /s

[–] randomdeadguy 1 points 3 months ago
[–] randomdeadguy 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

well at least his intentions were good 🤡

[–] randomdeadguy 2 points 3 months ago

I can see it as both blue/black or white/gold, just blink a few times!

[–] randomdeadguy 2 points 3 months ago

I agree, I wish things worked that way. If he loses, he can just pay to play again until he wins. People are confused and exploited in every place that has people, and someone else will come along to prey upon folks, because it is always personally advantageous.

[–] randomdeadguy -2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

such a brave corporate bot

[–] randomdeadguy 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Sorta harsh take, but I do agree that comparing these numbers with additional data would be helpful for establishing a clear understanding of income inequality. It seems this particular table was written for comparing differences in the shown group only.

[–] randomdeadguy 10 points 3 months ago

wow that's incredibly obtuse

[–] randomdeadguy 27 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Why do the representatives of this place not reflect the wishes of their constituents?

[–] randomdeadguy 4 points 3 months ago

So the share that has grandkids is the share that can afford them, right?

[–] randomdeadguy 2 points 3 months ago
view more: ‹ prev next ›