radix

He's more of a turtle golem.

Not a scientist by any means, but this article (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3767421/) says men have a 3:1 difference in the rate of Antisocial Personality Disorder.

Another: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3920596/

There is compelling evidence from behavioral genetic research that heritable influences are of importance in the development of antisocial behavior; approximately 50% of the total variance in antisocial behavior is explained by genetic influences. Yet, there is also evidence of a large environmental effect, both shared and non-shared environmental influences have been found to explain the remaining half of the variance.

Obviously I don't mean to suggest that everyone with ASPD is a serial killer, it presents in a number of ways, but it's hard to imagine a serial killer without some sort of disregard for the value of life. This is probably one of many factors that tilt the scale toward violence being much more associated with men.

Trump represents modern conservatism, but he himself? I'm not sure he actually stands for a whole lot beyond his own orange bubble.

He's mostly a blank slate (philosophically and intellectually) that the people around him can use to get their agendas enacted. He surrounds himself with sycophants and bootlickers, so as long as they promise him wealth and power, he is content to parrot the talking points he's given.

Steven Miller, Steve Bannon, Alex Jones, and all the others...those are the real evil motherfuckers. When Trump is out of the picture, they'll find some other half-wit to puppet. The fight won't end when one figurehead fades in to history.

idk, just one dude's thoughts.

(Just to be clear, none of that absolves him of the real damage he's done. Malicious indifference is still malicious.)

They may have won the chicken sandwich wars, but Taco Bell will be the only restaurant to survive the franchise wars.

Some of those that work forces are the same that burn crosses

1992

The pessimistic view: basically everything you do online can be tracked, sold, and bought by anyone with a few bucks. Poor online security means you have no privacy regardless of browser, while good (or at least "better") online security is possible with almost any browser.

If your friend is advocating switching browsers, but with no other behavioral changes, that's just a false sense of security, which may be worse.

To more directly address the question, unless you are a Chinese dissident, "China" having your browsing data isn't any better or worse that Google or Microsoft or Meta having that same data. Spoiler: for the average user, they already do.

Project 2025

Red/Silver

It was an early game pass title, priced at $60 to get people to sign up for a $10-15 subscription instead. If it had been released at ~$30 like the AA game it was, I believe it would have gotten a lot more leeway in the player reviews.

I did enjoy one playthrough. Most obsidian games beg the player to go again, but it didn't seem worth another 15-20 hours for a slightly different ending. Replay value is what's really missing for me.

Expectations are key. It's a pretty good game at the right price, but anyone expecting New Vegas in Space is left disappointed.

Teacher! They're calling me names!!

I can't draw a horse if I'm looking right at one.