pixxelkick

joined 2 years ago
[–] pixxelkick 27 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

They probably do use lots of NoSQL DBs too, which perform better for non relational "data lake" style architectures where you just wanna dump mountains of data as fast as possible into storage, to be perused later.

When you have cases where you have very very high volume of data in, but very low need to query it (but some potential need, just very low), nosql DBs excel

Stuff like census data where you just gotta legally store it for historical reasons, and very rarely some person will wanna query it for a study or something.

Keep in mind when I talk about low need to query, the opposite high need us on the scale of like, "this db gets queried multiple times per minute'

Stuff like... logins to a website, data that gets queried many times per minute or even second, then sometimes nosql DBs fall off.

Depends what is queried.

Super basic "lookup by ID" Stuff that operates as just a big ole KeyValuePair mapping ID -> Value? And thats all you gotta query?

NoSql is still the right tool for the job.

The moment any kind of JOIN enters the discussion though, chances are you actually wanna use sql now

[–] pixxelkick 4 points 2 weeks ago

Think about how often you see a question raised and then responded with "I don't know" in the internet data.

Wikipedia, textbooks, book books, forums, wiki how...

The vast majority of time, the format of what you see is:

<short question>?

<long winded answer or how to guide>

And thats what the llms are all trained on, that'd the most common pattern, so llms replicate that pattern.

The majority if their training data is off wikis abd textbooks, which pretty much never have "I dunno" anywhere. If an answer isn't known, instead, the page simply doesn't exist in the first place.

[–] pixxelkick 19 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This literally is. The dude is doing exactly what he said he would. Why is anyone surprised at what's going on.

[–] pixxelkick 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not easily, and not at the time, no, it really was a very easy way to quickly reduce bot problems at the time.

You'd get random spam for stuff that could flood your forums or etc, and setting up captcha had an extremely immediate and palpable effect on reducing the spam that came in from random bot farms and shit.

I can personally confirm that when I implemented captcha on my forums i maintained 14 years ago, it pretty substantially reduced spammers by a huge degree.

[–] pixxelkick 25 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I can personally confirm it very much did help curb botting issues on my website.

[–] pixxelkick 18 points 3 weeks ago (18 children)

It's a free service that's been provided to website makers to easily add a way to reduce bot spam. And for a very long time, it worked

Captcha got tonnes of free training data, and in return website maintainer got an incredibly handy free tool to help secure their site.

Captcha 100% could have charged licensing for their tool, could charged money for developers to use their service.

They didn't, and I think it's perfectly reasonable they got the training data as "payment" instead.

Your favorite free websites you use get to have another part of their architecture stay free.

The website maintainer get an awesome free tool.

Captcha got training data to profit off of.

That's good internet where everyone wins without the need for bullshit licensing and fees and royalties and subscriptions.

Would you have rather your Netflix account cost an extra 15 cents per month or whatever to offset yet another licensing cost for some captcha tool?

[–] pixxelkick 80 points 3 weeks ago

For those not aware:

This is the sector that handles nuclear fissile materials including the warhead stockpiles and the nuclear reactors

[–] pixxelkick 7 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Results are based on an online survey conducted on February 2, 2025, among 1,002 adults in Canada

... a thousand people total in all of canada as the basis for your study, wow, definitely sounds like super useful info.

[–] pixxelkick 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm seeing news of top level officials being forcefully removed from the premises and resisting eviction.

So how's that occurring with a single shot fired?

[–] pixxelkick 38 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (7 children)

Query:

Where the fuck are all these people's guns

Like if random dudes stroll into a government facility, start installing unapproved hardware to open uo vulnerabilities...

Why has literally no one just shot them?

Like isn't that straight up terrorist actions? I'd terrorists or hackers tried to do thus, wouldn't they just get...

shot?

Why didn't a single person in that enture building not just fucking shoot these people as soon as they started plugging unapproved stuff in? Shouldn't they all be fucking dead?

It's a federal government building, it's insane that random people could just walk in and plug stuff in without just getting fucking shot to death

Did they walk in with guns too? What? I don't understand, was it always just that easy to compromise the enture fucking US government infrastructure lol

Just walk in with a machine and a clipboard, plug it in and go "no no don't shoot, I'm with DOGE"

How was the response anything less than "we have no idea who the fuck you are, leave the building or we will open fire"

view more: ‹ prev next ›