People, 30 years later, talking like predicted!
marcos
joined 2 years ago
You might want to check that first source again.
About the second one... WTF? You'd wish to consult your Catholic traditions from some Catholic authority. Not whatever that is. But the first paragraph is almost normal, stick to it.
Well, that's the goal, isn't it?
but South Americans usually farm them if they’re a pest, rather than exterminating them, as they are very good meat animals
As a South American... Eww! Are you getting your facts from ChatGPT?
Catholics aren’t allowed to eat meat on friday
Again, as somebody that was grown catholic, where are you getting that from?
Mostly large snakes and jaguars eat them. Otherwise, nothing is really a danger.
Hum... Don't sniff that powder, it's sodium hydroxide and will burn through your nose if you do that...
Just to say, but I have a few circuit board etching recipes that require a diversity of white powder things measured on precision scales...
There aren't many videos out there of creatures trying to eat a capybara.
It takes some ferocious kind of predator to even attempt it.
Yes, and we know how to treat it (not cure, but we know how to make people not die) since, well, before the times depicted on the game. We have also knew how to avoid most of its infections since... hum, I don't know that one, but Ancient Rome was full of structures made for that, and functional, so some time before them.
Still people didn't use to be able to afford treatment (that is basically drinking large amounts of clean water with salt and sugar, and resting). And it takes a functional government to avoid it.
Oh, it's inside a pool! Yes, the nearly horizontal surfaces are the border tile, the transition tile and the pool bottom tile.
It does make sense. But I'm not sure why one would want 3 different tiles in a pool (the vertical, transition, and bottom).
Thanks, you just ruined the game!
(Just kidding, but it may be a solution to Factorio addiction.)
Looks like it's the end of some covered area, then a car path, and then the outside pavement.
(Where are the meme images from originally?)
A has been consistently improving it since before the change, so it's only possible that they are managing to the metric if they had earlier access to it.
B may be doing that, but the graph doesn't actually measure how many bugs you closed. Those ones seem to have decided to manage by the metric, removing the variance but targeting a high, comfortable level.
Agreed on C, they did a large "hey, we will be measured by that now" one time effort and then forgot about the metric.
The change didn't improve anybody's performance.