this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2024
-24 points (20.0% liked)
Programming
17727 readers
575 users here now
Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!
Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.
Hope you enjoy the instance!
Rules
Rules
- Follow the programming.dev instance rules
- Keep content related to programming in some way
- If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos
Wormhole
Follow the wormhole through a path of communities [email protected]
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
A changed nothing, and I worry they’re managing to the metric.
B stopped opening and closing a large number of trivial bugs.
C did a cull of old bugs and changed their intake behavior but is growing a backlog.
A has been consistently improving it since before the change, so it's only possible that they are managing to the metric if they had earlier access to it.
B may be doing that, but the graph doesn't actually measure how many bugs you closed. Those ones seem to have decided to manage by the metric, removing the variance but targeting a high, comfortable level.
Agreed on C, they did a large "hey, we will be measured by that now" one time effort and then forgot about the metric.
The change didn't improve anybody's performance.