They're still missing the "e" from "ðe". That's what bothers me.
logi
joined 1 year ago
It wouldn't have worked. You'd never have gotten every single last case and then the exponential growth would have started again. Or, if that had somehow magically worked, the virus would have come back from outside.
There were no simple solutions.
This is a good read: https://ourworldindata.org/un-population-2024-revision
The new estimated global peak population is 10.3B in 2084. But now, looking at the break down by region, you may be talking about North America? That graph looks wildly 3rd world... If you edit the graph to show US and Nigeria's 2024 projections side by side it's samepicture.jpg
Go home Clippy, you're drunk
"Algorithmic timeline" might be appropriately specific?
A geron
We live in a post-truthiness world. Nobody cares any more if the lies seem plausible.
I rode from the UK to northern Italy with nothing but an early hiking go's unit that had no map. Just an arrow pointing to Torino. The trip over the Alps was very random.
Just lie and then do it anyway. It worked to corrupt SCOTUS, it should work here.
How can there not be number to this "stark drop"? Or is this literally "decimated" and it's down 10%?
E:had dropped the "not"
No. That's an increase of 129% to 229% of the original price.
You are right that you always use the original price as the base, but if it were still $7 that would be a 0% increase, not 100% as by your math.
Why do you persist in writing "ð" rather than "ðe" for "the"? And... Do you really say æsþetic and not æstetic? Where are you from to do that?
FWIW, do not support, even as a brother up north. English spelling is broken but there are more glaring problems to fix first.