The fact that you're registered is wild to me. One of the few things my state has right is having open primaries imo
kofe
joined 1 year ago
My state banned ranked choice voting by an insane margin because it was worded like "only citizens should be allowed to vote, and each citizen only gets one vote each!" Literally two Google searches would clear it up if people had more critical thinking skills
I was rushing to get these done between school and a work trip, but I kept each of the 5 questions to under 3 minutes here: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL39NG7BfoHIhrNMQNXj71fMYjIdGob0G5&si=T-xe_nqX2EONwHq0
I hope this helps! I'll do a more comprehensive look after we get results in. See you at the polls!
Are they arguing it wasn't random though? I mean Shakespeare had to think through the plot and everything, not just scribble nonsense on a page
I'm subbed to my local NPR's daily top news stories. Highly recommend folks in the US look to see if their local station has a similar program or find the closest one.
This gave me a weird reminder of an elementary teacher I had that wore this animal print often (not like leopard print, but actual leopards on it?)
In hindsight, your question is spot on. I was an extremely miserable child to even take note enough to still remember that in a critical way. Not that I'm critical of it now, and I never said it to the teacher or anything. I gave her trouble enough in other ways
I wish I remembered her name now. Poor lady. She was nice
69% of the time, it works every time
Again with insults? I don't think I'll be continuing to reply. Have a good one.
I see where you're coming from. It could branch out to any person or organization, though, wouldn't you think? Like I brought up in my original comment, I "stage" my home for myself, firstly, because it makes me feel comfortable. I also do a lot of video calls for work, school, and with friends. So I wonder where the delineation is. When and why does it become inauthentic?
I'm in a charged enough environment that seeing your aggressive language is too much for me to read beyond three sentences. It doesn't seem you read my full comment based on those three, anyway. You don't need to reply or repeat yourself but if you don't mind clarifying, would you mind considering running it by ChatGPT or something to make sure it's civil first? I don't think my comment warranted this attitude. Thank you.
view more: next ›
If the follow up to you saying you're done is them demanding to keep going, that is coercive and fucked up. I wouldn't suggest lying in response unless you never plan to see them again, though, or if you feel safe and plan to address it later. It's just as fucked up to keep up with the lie afterwards as it is to be coercive, imo. Both play coercive, indirect ways of refusing respect, and the tit-for-tat dynamic risks setting up a breeding grounds of resentment for at least the person maintaining a lie. It also denies the coercive person the opportunity for growth.