jumperalex

joined 2 years ago
[–] jumperalex 51 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I have accepted that two things can be trust at once: I can be sad for her and amused at the leopard eating her face. I have no problem containing both of those emotions at the same time without hating myself one ounce.

jumper

[–] jumperalex 3 points 2 months ago

No no no, see they are OUTSIDE the environment.

[–] jumperalex 46 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"curing at birth" != "Eugenics"

Still, the spirit of accommodation is spot on.

[–] jumperalex 0 points 2 months ago

Please remember this statement when we see what exactly the Trump admin does to stop the genocide.

[–] jumperalex 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It is possible for two things to be true at the same time. Sure Kamala might have lost for the reasons you suggest. And it can also be true that another group is about to Find Out what Trump is going to do. Just the last few days alone are giving a lot of evidence that the Palestinian people are not going to be better off with Trump in office.

As for it not being strategic, well, that depends if you think the strategy was ONLY to win the election as opposed to trying to do what he thought best in a horrific and complex situation; and ONLY if you think there was an alternative course of action that would have actually won the election.

I'm not sure why folks are only hearing, or responding to, the coulda/woulda/shoulda side of the conversation. A side for which I haven't really disagreed with in spirit, namely yes Biden/Harris surely knew there were electoral consequences to their actions, among other much sadder consequences, but you continue to ignore the actual topic of conversation ... What the future holds.

Okay I can take a guess why [shrug] but such is life. Feel free to have one more reply, I'm done beating a dead leopard.

[–] jumperalex -3 points 2 months ago

Didn't say what was or was not moral or the complexity of genocide. I said that diplomacy is much more complex than either side wants to admit when they are emotionally invested (for very good reasons!) in painting the other side of the argument as heartless / savage / inhuman.

Regardless, my central premise hasn't changed: I hope the whole situation can be brought to a peaceful conclusion as fast as possible with a framework for lasting peace. BUT, I don't think Trump is the one to make it happen, I don't even think the US can actually make it happen, and I worry there are a lot of US voters who will suddenly be realizing the Leopard actually ate THEIR face. But hey, maybe Huckabee and Stefanik will decide the Palestinians are real and care about them more than Biden or Harris and Trump won't lift all military restrictions on Israel on the 1st day in office like the referenced article [shrug] I actually do hope so, but I obviously am not holding my breath.

[–] jumperalex 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

You're right I have no more intimate knowledge of his internal feelings than you do. I have however seen enough humanity in him to believe he has more empathy than Trump who has a very well documented history of narcissism bordering on psychopathy.

As for my "care" of his humanity being besmirched, I don't actually. My issue was with your questionable assertion that he doesn't care and the implication that maybe (but maybe not) you actually think Trump cares more.

As for his actions as the president of the united states, who has the full weight of international geopolitics, national politics, and an election to consider, I'd say the job is no where near as simple as you'd like it to seem and as much as I hate (or don't hate but am resigned) to admit it, there is a limit to what the United States can actually do to make a difference in Gaza that might not have other undesirable results.

[–] jumperalex 1 points 2 months ago

If we're lucky he'll last less time than a Scaramucci and we'll have a new unit of measurement.

[–] jumperalex 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)
[–] jumperalex 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

Not going to debate what Biden (since as VP Harris has no actual power to do anything) has done or not done nor your opinions of what he's done or not done. I do take issue that you think he doesn't care, at a human level I just don't think that's true. What he's done to express that humanity given geopolitical realities is the real issue.

But anyone who actually thinks Trump cares at all about innocent life, or anyone's life but his own, or cares about the legacy he leaves behind may find themselves rethinking that opinion in the coming year.

Now that the election is over, I truly do hope something good gets done. We of course won't know what Harris could have accomplished, but we'll certainly know if Trump tries and if he succeeds. Keeping fingers crossed.

ETA: I'll just drop this here https://www.reuters.com/world/us/muslims-who-voted-trump-upset-by-his-pro-israel-cabinet-picks-2024-11-15/

[–] jumperalex 4 points 2 months ago

ahh gotcha. 100% agree! aka FO in full effect haha

[–] jumperalex 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Well, um ... I ... errrrr, hear me out. Trump doesn't have to do ANYTHING he doesn't want to just because someone gave him money. He doesn't even really have to do anything because he wants money from anyone. He has no political career to protect and he has plenty of people who want to give him money willingly for practically nothing, just to be near him.

Now that last part is important because I'm not saying money won't influence his decisions; only that the operating theory isn't "I paid you now I own you!" it's "I'll give you more money if you do what I want." And heck they don't even have to give him money, they just have to flatter him and tell him he's a big boy now!

So he's really not indebted to anyone. What will they do? take the money back? Threaten him with what?

Blackmail / kompromat is an entirely different conversation, but let's also be clear, "47 took money to do this thing" is not blackmail that will work. Nor would be the release of the pee pee tapes if they exist. At this point I'm really not sure what he actually could be blackmailed with other than the literal smoking gun that is big enough to get him impeached by a republican congress and thrown in jail. And I don't know if that smoking gun exists.

tl;dr he's worse than a lame duck because previous lame ducks cared about their legacy, their party, and their country. He cares about nothing but his own personal gain. He can't be bought, be he sure as hell can be sold.

view more: ‹ prev next ›