jerkface

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Utter non sequitur. This is something someone says to bulwark their worldview to themselves, not to convince others of the merits of their view. You're just proving my point.

The lies we tell ourselves are not convincing to others.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So when the USA resumes conducting illegal detentions, extraordinary renditions, and mass expulsions in a few months, I guess that's just the consequence of living in a free and democratic country, and we should just accept it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's not silly. It is the most reasonable lens through which to examine the citizen's relationship with police: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monopoly_on_violence

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Solutions don't get people elected; problems do. Manufacture problems and blame your opponents for them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You should. You'd like it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think there's an "R" in it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

You used the word pride several times. We should be teaching shame. What we did was shameful, but necessary. Yes, all those examples you give are things I consider glorification. We could show respect and gratitude without glorification. And especially without specifically targeting children with these ideas and not allowing for important counterpoints. That's propaganda. It sounds as though you are saying, "There's glorification, but for reasons I agree with, so it's okay."

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's not what I said. It's right there on the screen. Neither is it what the article says. I won't engage with such rhetorical devices that border on sophistry.

If you have services available other than the police, it is in your interest to prefer those. Societaly, it is in our interest to offload non-violent services from the police onto social workers and other non-violent labour.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I agree with everything you just said (with some assumptions). What you did not say that was necessary for your comment to be relevant, and isn't true is: "Glorification of war never happens at Remembrance Day ceremonies in Canada." It absolutely does.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

The person saying this has also lost the game, so the joy comes from dragging someone innocent down with you.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I just learned something I can use.

 

Back in the day, we had Cybernetic Bazaar and other such shops in town where you could go to get used, older components for computers. I don't think there's anything like that in town right now. How far do you have to go to find a computer junk shop?

 

Veganism doesn't come up very often in his work but when it does he is not shy about it. Otherwise, it's nice to have a comic I know isn't going to say something stupid and cruel.

 

So do we still have Chinese police working in Waterloo or did they fix that? I feel like they would have said something if they fixed that.

 

If anyone is spinning up a new 7DTD game today, I'd love to join! New release drops in a couple hours.

 

There are some perennial debates in online communities so let me just get ahead of a few and state the editorial position of this lemmunity. I don't see my position changing a great deal but you're welcome to share yours.

  • Veganism is about animal rights and animal exploitation. If those things cannot be shown relevant, it's not about veganism. A plant-based diet intended to lose weight and save the climate doesn't especially have anything to do with veganism.

  • "Exploitation" is taken to mean to use for any benefit, without additional connotations, such as in: "She exploited her superior knowledge of the rules to outperform her opponents." If you're getting something out of it, it's exploitation. The negative connotations of the word only come up when it involves unconsenting, sentient creatures.

  • "Animals" are taken to mean non-human animals. Vegan philosophy does not concern human-human interactions. Humans may sometimes exploit one another, because humans have the capacity to consent when it is mutually beneficial. Veganism assumes that an animal does not have the capacity to consent to exploitation, in the same way that mainstream moral philosophy assumes that children do not have the capacity to consent. It is an assumption we make for the protection of the vulnerable, even though there is no hard line between adult and child, or animal and human.

  • Owning an animal for companionship is exploitation.

  • Attempting to make another creature unnecessarily dependent on you is abuse, whether it's an animal or a human.

  • All the intelligent creatures we create are our children and are all owed unconditional love from their creators.

  • No one is perfect. We all have blood on our hands.

 

Steel bands tighten around my heart. My knees knock and my vision wavers. But then I remember I'm not on Reddit, and metacanada has not yet replaced the moderation team with pod people.

What measures are in place to ensure the continuing security of our moderation team? If it won't compromise them to tell us.

view more: ‹ prev next ›