Here it is rough-cut with the food set, for perspective. I should add that I finished it with Tried and True Varnish Oil, which is food-safe (made only from polymerized linseed oil + pine rosin).
jasparagus
Because the data was pretty noisy, I filtered out everything with <10 benchmarks. I manually checked the source (listed in the header post) and it looks like there are 2 benches for that card, and they yielded 4.93it/s and 6.38it/s.
That kind of variability is why I constrained it to 10+ measurements and took the median to exclude outliers.
Is your goal to mechanically handle the upgrading of the weapons, or to just track the evolution of the weapons somewhere? Honestly, in the interest of simplicity, I'd probably go with something like a journal entry for the ancestral weapons, with a page of clickable rollable tables for any rolls they'd need to do (or for any thematic info, like a wiki) and then write (or ask players to write) a cool thematic blurb for each "level" up of the weapon if that's something they're interested in having/doing.
I'm not aware of any modules that handle this automatically, but I think it's not something I'd see as worth building out.
If you really want to go mechanical with it, you could do an actor sheet and build all the different "level up" stuff as features, put it all in a compendium, and then have players select/drop in features from that compendium... the obvious downside is that all still has to be manually updated when the day is done. Then again, there are worse tasks than getting to bump your weapon up to +2 :).
Here is the data in text form (someone let me know if they've got a good idea for a less... oof.... way of formatting this comment haha).
GPU It/s (Median)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6GB x1.0 6GB 1.11
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER x1.0 6GB 1.22
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti x1.0 6GB 1.265
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 x1.0 8GB 1.45
NVIDIA P104-100 x1.0 8GB 1.695
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 x1.0 8GB 1.965
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU x1.0 4GB 2.235
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU x1.0 4GB 2.3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti x1.0 11GB 2.76
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 x1.0 8GB 4.05
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 x1.0 6GB 4.155
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Laptop GPU x1.0 8GB 4.88
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Laptop GPU x1.0 6GB 5.345
Tesla T4 x1.0 15GB 5.54
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT x1.0 8GB 5.64
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 x1.0 8GB 5.755
AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT x1.0 12GB 5.925
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER x1.0 8GB 6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER x1.0 8GB 6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 x1.0 12GB 6.18
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Laptop GPU x1.0 8GB 6.87
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti x1.0 8GB 7.65
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT x1.0 16GB 8.255
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER x1.0 8GB 8.53
AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT x1.0 16GB 8.91
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti x1.0 8GB 9.725
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 x1.0 8GB 9.74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 x3.0 24GB 10.465
NVIDIA RTX A4000 x1.0 16GB 10.63
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti x1.0 11GB 10.74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 x2.0 24GB 11.725
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 x1.0 10GB 11.9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 x1.0 12GB 12.03
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti x1.0 22GB 12.08
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Laptop GPU x1.0 16GB 12.2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti x1.0 12GB 13.38
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 x1.0 12GB 13.4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 x1.0 24GB 13.565
NVIDIA RTX A5000 x1.0 24GB 14.065
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti x1.0 12GB 14.335
Radeon RX 7900 XTX x1.0 24GB 15.18
Tesla V100S-PCIE-32GB x1.0 32GB 15.37
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 x1.0 16GB 15.74
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti x1.0 24GB 16.25
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 x1.0 22GB 16.495
NVIDIA H100 PCIe x1.0 79GB 19.21
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 x1.0 24GB 20.89
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 x2.0 24GB 22.31
NVIDIA A100-SXM4-80GB x1.0 79GB 23.59
All the feature offerings in v11 & v12 are just gravy.
Honestly true, though I partially love Foundry for how much that kind of thing improves quality of life (e.g. integrated backups). I used to use Roll20... prep was awful, even with very few bells and whistles. Now I can prep so much faster, with a way better "product".
Yeah, unfortunately that was my experience there, too. I unsubbed after a while. I'm fairness, it's hard to write contemporary assessments of new products based on their future longevity lol. Maybe we need a /c/ThingsThatAreRepairable instead...?
This is hilarious and adorable.
Looks like it's a common question, and is still under debate!
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_mare
The reason that the mare basalts are predominantly located on the near-side hemisphere of the Moon is still being debated by the scientific community. Based on data obtained from the Lunar Prospector mission, it appears that a large proportion of the Moon's inventory of heat producing elements (in the form of KREEP) is located within the regions of Oceanus Procellarum and the Imbrium basin, a unique geochemical province now referred to as the Procellarum KREEP Terrane.[10][11][12] While the enhancement in heat production within the Procellarum KREEP Terrane is most certainly related to the longevity and intensity of volcanism found there, the mechanism by which KREEP became concentrated within this region is not agreed upon.[13]
It is commonly suggested that there is some form of link between the synchronous rotation of the Moon about the Earth, and the mare basalts. However, gravitational torques that result in tidal despinning only arise from the moments of inertia of the body (these are directly relatable to the spherical harmonic degree-2 terms of the gravity field), and the mare basalts hardly contribute to this (see also tidal locking). (Hemispheric structures correspond to spherical harmonic degree 1, and do not contribute to the moments of inertia.) Furthermore, tidal despinning is predicted to have occurred quickly (in the order of thousands of years), whereas the majority of mare basalts erupted about one billion years later.
Here's a good explainer:
What is tidal locking? https://phys.org/news/2015-11-tidal.html
Basically, the moon acted like a spinning (unbalanced) wheel, and eventually stopped with the "heavy" side pointing "down" towards Earth. I.e. think of the moon as orbiting Earth with the heavy side staying pointed at Earth.
I believe it is for posts specific to communities on your instance (server), which in your case is lemmy.world.
Oh, don't get me wrong -- I'm still salty that Tesla refused to use the standard that literally everyone else agreed on. It's maddening, and wasted a lot of time. That doesn't detract from me being glad that they're finally opening up their network (probably to get in on federal money, but... perhaps that's federal money doing what it was supposed to do?). I really, sincerely hope it'll motivate some others join in on making actual infrastructure to compete, but I won't hold my breath.
So yeah, here we are, and ... well, at this point, I just want some #@$(*&S#@ing infrastructure built.
This is nuts!