I think you have to consider personality as well. Aang is very much like "air". He's free and spiritual. Korra, on the other hand, is nothing like water. She's impulsive and hotheaded. It only makes sense that her most used element would be fire.
hellofriend
Personally, I think it depends on the sitch. Something immutable would probably be the better go for people coming from Windows and would help with IT costs since all systems would be, at their base, the same. No one is going to accidentally install something that breaks their system. And the main drawback of immutability (less control over the system) wouldn't be a problem because people shouldn't be installing things on government systems that are outside the scope of their job.
EDIT: In a sentence: a good distro is one that's good for your organization.
Depends where you are. I can't speculate on the EU or its member-states. But here in Canada, your information is basically stuck at an organization unless you give consent to have it sent somewhere else. And it gets even more complicated when it involves a provincial-federal relationship.
Makes sense for Aang to airbend far more than the others. Who's fought an airbender in the last hundred years? Plus, it's his native element that he's already mastered. He has far less experience with the others.
It's pretty interesting, given the above, that Korra is much more balanced in her use of bending. She's been practicing the first three forms since she was a child and mastered airbending during the course of the show. The writers seem to have put some thought into how both characters would fight given their respective backgrounds.
Solution: don't ship a shitty distro. This is the sort of issue that actual IT professionals need final say in. Not the MBAs. Not the politicals. The people who actually know what they're doing. Additionally, years ago Linux was in a much different place. It's really matured into something more suitable for both the average end user as well as professional adoption.
Governments tend to have security standards that differ from most solutions readily available. Not saying this is the case, but it's a possibility.
Could easily fork a distro and pay a government agency or independent entity the same amount as Microsoft is currently being paid to maintain the distro. Or they could put financial backing on any of the current commercial Linux solutions out there. It's far from farfetched.
Bodied and/or wrecked
Thanks so much! I'll pay it forward :)
I'm super interested in Dishonoured. You're a pretty cool dude :)
Cry about it