greencactus

joined 1 year ago
[–] greencactus 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

This doesn't work here, because by death of the CEO the insurance of the USA probably won't be switched to a public healthcare. The dragon will continue eating people, simply with a different head.

[–] greencactus 3 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

That is actually a very interesting take, thank you for sharing.

For me, it was always clear that actions do not define us as people. I never thought that people might see it differently.

I think it is important to distinguish the term value here. I hope we both agree that every person has dignity. I live in Germany, and the first sentence of our Constitution is "Human dignity shall be inviolable." That means that I do not have the right to judge a persons value as a person - the Nazis were a famous example for doing that. That's why in today's judiciary system, at least in Germany, we e.g. do not lock people away forever: a person always has the chance to improve, work upon themselves, and get out of prison. The prison time can be extended into infinity, if a person poses a threat to society - but if they don't, they can get free. Their value to society may be close to zero, perhaps negative - but they still possess value and dignity as a human.

This guy was subtracting value from society, and his value to you and me was probably negative. But it still is different than a humans internal value. To murder a person is to take their internal and external value, and to break their dignity. This is something which is not compatible with my consciousness.

[–] greencactus -2 points 4 weeks ago (6 children)

Yes, good point. I agree. Maybe there's also a difference in perception of these tales, because when a dragon is slain the people can regain their wealth. In this case though, the wealth of the CEO doesn't get transferred to the people. Buuut one can argue that we have an inheritance tax, thus part of his hoarded money WILL get transferred to the people, in which case the murderer is actually returning the wealth to the people and the dragon metaphor isn't that invalid after all. It gets very quickly very murky ethically. I presume that while the wealth is parked away in some off-shore, probably some of it at least will return to the State. A lot depends though on the tax rate, how exactly the taxing goes, who does it,...

Long story short - this guy was way too rich, no question asked. That's for sure.

[–] greencactus -1 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

I agree with everything you say, up until the last sentence. Probably as a disclaimer, I study psychology and want to become a clinical psychotherapist. I deeply believe that no person wants to be bad. In fact, I am of the utmost conviction that every person has the potential to become a better person than they are right now. That does not absolve him of his crimes - in fact, it is quite the contrary: he chose to go down the path of evil and to condemn people to die. But that doesn't mean that he cannot ever change to become better. It is a part of my life philosophy that every person can heal. Obviously many people won't do so - this guy DEFINITELY would've had the chance to go to a psychotherapist himself, for sure. But that does not mean that he deserved to die. My argumentation is heavily based on Albert Ellis (one of the founders of cognitive-behavioural therapy) and REBT. In short, Ellis said that our actions do not determine us as whole human beings. The fact that we often act badly doesn't make us bad human beings, nor does the fact that we act well makes us good. We are simply humans, and to judge us means putting yourself in the shoes of a God. We can and should judge our actions, by all means - but we are far, far more than actions. To judge a person as a whole is a position I do not want to take. And even though this guy wanted to see himself as a God, I personally want to stay human and recognize that he is and was a broken spirit and a human, just as you and I are. Even though he might have wanted to discard his humanity, he still is and stays human.

Tl;Dr - terrible actions, has committed countless crimes. But his actions don't determine his worth as a human. Thus I do not want to say that he deserved to die, nor that he was evil as a human.

[–] greencactus 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (7 children)

I disagree. Still thank you for replying - I appreciate it. It got me thinking about my personal position.

[–] greencactus 0 points 4 weeks ago

Thank you for letting me know about my phrasing. I disagree, and have corrected my post now. Thank you!

[–] greencactus 0 points 4 weeks ago

And many people do, I fear :/ I think I've read a few too many times "I'm okay with death penalties for [child rapists/ war criminals/ mass murderers/ insert group here]".

[–] greencactus -2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (19 children)

I disagree with this metaphor. Humans aren't inherently evil, in contrast to the dragon. Even though the guy definitely did evil shit as a CEO and is responsible for thousands of dead people, he is not fully evil. I'm very sure he also did good things.

For me this is really important, because that's exactly why I oppose death penalty. No human is absolutely evil, and thus in every person there is something worth preserving and being protected.

[–] greencactus 12 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Unklar. Es gibt keine wirklich tragfähige Koalition. Das einzige vereinende hier ist die Allianz zwischen Links und Rechts gegen den gemeinsamen Feind.

[–] greencactus 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ahhh, I already wondered where PugJesus is in a thread about Rome - luckily you didn't disappoint! :D

[–] greencactus 1 points 1 month ago

Wenn ich so viel Geld hätte :D Aber ja, Bordeaux ist echt ne geile Stadt

53
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by greencactus to c/autism
 

My partner and I just had a talk about it. Basically, she celebrated her birthday today. I was on her party, and it was fun, but I left after around 2 hours to get home and relax a bit. After I arrived, a friend of mine texted me and asked me if I wanted to go to a lake and see the sunset. I agreed, we went to the lake and went swimming in it; it was really nice. Later, after arriving at my partners, she talked with me that it hurts her that I went out with someone else on her birthday, doing a romantically coded activity.

To be honest, I realize that I don't have a single clue what is coded as a romantically coded activity. For me, this was something completely okay and appropriate, because it is for me clearly a friend-thing; but my partner explained to me that the combination of going out with another person on her birthday and going to a sea, which is a secluded place, just heavily connotates it in a romantic way.

I understand that what I've done here wasn't right, and that I have responsibility here. Even though I didn't want to hurt my partner, it is still my responsibility to inform myself here on romantically conmotated things you shouldn't do in a partnership. So, dear people of Lemmy, what does constitute a romantic moment?

Edit: I've left out some information which seems to be important for the whole picture . I've copied it out of my comment and adding it here:


Me and my gf got together in August of last year, so basically 8 months ago; we were friends for half a year before that. She got cheated on in her long distance relationship before.

The friend who invited me to the sea I actually know for almost as long as my partner, from the beginning of Uni. She had a breakup from a three-year old relationship a few months ago, and I was there to support her. I didn't clarify before though if she was okay with me cuddling with people or not; I assumed it was with her, because it was okay in her LDR before - which was wrong of me. I overstepped the boundaries of my partner here.

The friend in question kissed me at the neck while I was at hers. I talked with her about it and let her know that I wasn't okay with it, to which she reacted quite hurt. She then told me that we shouldn't be friends, but two weeks ago she collapsed at Uni and I brought her home. Now we are meeting again.

While I'm writing this down, I'm actually starting to notice that there are a lot of other factors playing in why my partner is upset here. She has been cheated on in the past, which definitely leads her to feel uncomfortable about my actions, even though I obviously don't want to cheat. I broke a societally unwritten rule of not meeting people in romantically coded settings on your partners birthday. And I overstepped the boundary of my partner before by cuddling with the friend without my partners consent.


 

Hey y'all,

I'm a 19 year old psychology student in college (with the goal of becoming a therapist) and have been diagnosed last summer with autism (low support needs).

I think the fact that so many of my peers go to parties, drink and have fun, while it is too overstimulating for me, feels really bad. I can't go to a party without earplugs, beer tastes awful to me (and coffee as well - way too intense for my taste), as soon as there's blood in a movie I feel unconformable, and it just feels that everyone is able to do thing easily which for me are a real struggle.

I'm in a relationship, and my gf seems to be able to do all these things easier than me. Asides from the fact that she also has better grades than me, I just feel resentment and sadness that people around me seem to better than me in so many aspects. Of course we should focus on our strengths, and that we shouldn't compare ourselves to others. But in the end I still feel resentment that people around me are just able to do so many more things than me, and that things considered normal in our society are a struggle, if not outright impossible, for autistic people.

So I'd love some input on how y'all cope with the reality of not being able to participate in social life to the same extent as other people.

Thanks!

171
submitted 9 months ago by greencactus to c/aww
 
 
177
Cuddles (lemmy.world)
submitted 11 months ago by greencactus to c/aww
 
211
Hungry boiss (lemmy.world)
submitted 11 months ago by greencactus to c/aww
 

They just want a snackie snack :)

5
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by greencactus to c/[email protected]
 

Die gesamte Stadt steht still, die zentrale Haltestelle (Augustusplatz) wird teilweise nicht bedient - nur eine Hälfte fährt noch, und wer weiß wie stabil. Der gesamte Innenstadtring steht still. Ich habe Leipzig noch nie in einem solchen Zustand gesehen. Wie sieht es bei Euch in der Region so aus?

220
A cuddly labrador (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by greencactus to c/aww
 

He always looks like that :)

 

And then you always want to crawl into my bed and cuddle. Theo, you are adorable, but why do you ALWAYS need to get dirty before coming home 🥲

258
Thirsty bois (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by greencactus to c/aww
 
165
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by greencactus to c/aww
 

I love you, Theo.

Also he is the biggest potato this world has ever seen ;)

 

I'll start :)

I still clearly remember one particular incident. It was my first playthrough, where I didn't know what to do at all, and I've been pretty battered down. I arrived in Pelagiad while the sun was settling behind the horizon, really exhausted and close to getting killed. But just the feeling of finally going around the corner and seeing the tavern, knowing I'll be safe there, was an amazing feeling of relier. I'll hold it with me forever, and I don't think any other game managed to implement it in such a way.

What are your memories?

view more: ‹ prev next ›