this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
706 points (96.4% liked)

memes

10793 readers
3047 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

Dragons aren't inharently evil either. They mostly just want to horde wealth. Sure, they do evil things to amass that wealth, but that doesn't make them evil, right?

Wait, was this about dragons or the ultra-wealthy? I forgot what I was talking about.

[–] greencactus -2 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Yes, good point. I agree. Maybe there's also a difference in perception of these tales, because when a dragon is slain the people can regain their wealth. In this case though, the wealth of the CEO doesn't get transferred to the people. Buuut one can argue that we have an inheritance tax, thus part of his hoarded money WILL get transferred to the people, in which case the murderer is actually returning the wealth to the people and the dragon metaphor isn't that invalid after all. It gets very quickly very murky ethically. I presume that while the wealth is parked away in some off-shore, probably some of it at least will return to the State. A lot depends though on the tax rate, how exactly the taxing goes, who does it,...

Long story short - this guy was way too rich, no question asked. That's for sure.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The usual impetus for slaying the dragon is to stop it from eating people.

[–] greencactus 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This doesn't work here, because by death of the CEO the insurance of the USA probably won't be switched to a public healthcare. The dragon will continue eating people, simply with a different head.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

I didn't say this was an effective way to solve the problem, nor do I think the other poster's assertion is accurate.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)